AT&T: Difference between revisions

From 3DO World
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''AT&T Inc.''' is an American multinational corporation|multinational conglomerate (company)|conglomerate holding company, Delaware General Corporation Law|Delaware-registered but it is headquartered at Whitacre Tower in Downtown Dallas, Texas. It is the world’s largest telecommunications company, and the  second largest provider of mobile telephone services. {{as of|2020|}}, AT&T was ranked 9th on the Fortune 500|''Fortune'' 500 rankings of the largest United States corporations, with revenues of $181 billion.
[[File:AT&T Logo.png|thumb|right]]
 
<big><big>'''3DO'''</big></big>
 
Not much is known about AT&T's relationship with 3DO and why they never ended up releasing a console, however, they did display a [[AT&T 3DO|prototype]] at the January 1994 Consumer Electronic Show.
 
Early 95 AT&T confirmed they were exiting the games business, they filed to dispose of their 3DO stake in May 95.
 
== Company Overview ==
 
'''AT&T Inc.''' is an American multinational corporation|multinational conglomerate (company)|conglomerate holding company, Delaware General Corporation Law|Delaware-registered but it is headquartered at Whitacre Tower in Downtown Dallas, Texas. It is the world’s largest telecommunications company, and the  second largest provider of mobile telephone services. as of2020, AT&T was ranked 9th on the ''Fortune'' 500 rankings of the largest United States corporations, with revenues of $181 billion.


During most of the 20th century, AT&T had a monopoly on phone service in the United States. The company began its history as the American District Telegraph Company, formed in St. Louis in 1878. After expanding services to Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, through a series of mergers, it became Southwestern Bell Telephone Company in 1920, which was then a subsidiary of American Telephone and Telegraph Company. The latter was a successor of the original Bell Telephone Company founded by Alexander Graham Bell in 1877. The American Bell Telephone Company formed the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) subsidiary in 1885. In 1899, AT&T became the parent company after the American Bell Telephone Company sold its assets to its subsidiary. The company was rebranded as AT&T Corporation|AT&T Corp. in 1994. The 1982 United States v. AT&T antitrust lawsuit resulted in the Breakup of the Bell System|divestiture of AT&T's ("Ma Bell") local operating subsidiaries which were grouped into seven Regional Bell Operating Company|Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs), commonly referred to as "Baby Bells", resulting in seven independent companies, The latter changed its name to SBC Communications Inc. in 1995. In 2005, SBC purchased its former parent AT&T Corp. and took on its branding, with the merged entity naming itself AT&T Inc. and using its history, a version of its iconic logo and stock-trading symbol. AT&T Inc. acquired BellSouth|BellSouth Corporation in 2006, the last independent Baby Bell company, making its formerly joint venture Cingular|Cingular Wireless (which had acquired AT&T Wireless in 2004) wholly owned and rebranding it as AT&T Mobility.
During most of the 20th century, AT&T had a monopoly on phone service in the United States. The company began its history as the American District Telegraph Company, formed in St. Louis in 1878. After expanding services to Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, through a series of mergers, it became Southwestern Bell Telephone Company in 1920, which was then a subsidiary of American Telephone and Telegraph Company. The latter was a successor of the original Bell Telephone Company founded by Alexander Graham Bell in 1877. The American Bell Telephone Company formed the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) subsidiary in 1885. In 1899, AT&T became the parent company after the American Bell Telephone Company sold its assets to its subsidiary. The company was rebranded as AT&T Corporation|AT&T Corp. in 1994. The 1982 United States v. AT&T antitrust lawsuit resulted in the Breakup of the Bell System|divestiture of AT&T's ("Ma Bell") local operating subsidiaries which were grouped into seven Regional Bell Operating Company|Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs), commonly referred to as "Baby Bells", resulting in seven independent companies, The latter changed its name to SBC Communications Inc. in 1995. In 2005, SBC purchased its former parent AT&T Corp. and took on its branding, with the merged entity naming itself AT&T Inc. and using its history, a version of its iconic logo and stock-trading symbol. AT&T Inc. acquired BellSouth|BellSouth Corporation in 2006, the last independent Baby Bell company, making its formerly joint venture Cingular|Cingular Wireless (which had acquired AT&T Wireless in 2004) wholly owned and rebranding it as AT&T Mobility.
Line 6: Line 16:


== History ==
== History ==
{{Further|History of AT&T}}


=== Origin and growth (1885–1981) ===
=== Origin and growth (1885–1981) ===
Line 44: Line 53:
On November 20, 2017, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim filed a lawsuit for the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division to block the merger with Time Warner, saying it "will harm competition, result in higher bills for consumers and less innovation." In order for AT&T to fully acquire Time Warner, the Department of Justice stated that the company must divest either DirecTV or Turner Broadcasting System.
On November 20, 2017, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim filed a lawsuit for the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division to block the merger with Time Warner, saying it "will harm competition, result in higher bills for consumers and less innovation." In order for AT&T to fully acquire Time Warner, the Department of Justice stated that the company must divest either DirecTV or Turner Broadcasting System.


{{as of|2017}}, AT&T is the world's largest telecommunications company. AT&T is also the largest provider of mobile telephone  services and the largest provider of telephone|fixed telephone services in the United States.
As of 2017, AT&T is the world's largest telecommunications company. AT&T is also the largest provider of mobile telephone  services and the largest provider of telephone|fixed telephone services in the United States.


On March 7, 2018, the company prepared to sell a minority stake of DirecTV Latin America through an Initial public offering|IPO, creating a new holding company for those assets named Vrio Corp. However, on April 18, just a day before the public debut of Vrio, AT&T canceled the IPO due to market conditions.
On March 7, 2018, the company prepared to sell a minority stake of DirecTV Latin America through an Initial public offering|IPO, creating a new holding company for those assets named Vrio Corp. However, on April 18, just a day before the public debut of Vrio, AT&T canceled the IPO due to market conditions.
Line 67: Line 76:


In May 2021, AT&T announced it will spin off WarnerMedia which will merge with Discovery, Inc. for $43 billion.
In May 2021, AT&T announced it will spin off WarnerMedia which will merge with Discovery, Inc. for $43 billion.
==AT&T Latin America==
==AT&T Latin America==
{{Infobox company
| name = AT&T Latin America, LLC
| logo =
| former_name = AT&T International, Inc. (2017-2018)
| type = Division (business)|Division
| foundation = {{start date and age|2017}}
| location_city = Dallas, Texas
| location_country = United States<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bloomberg |title=AT&T Latin America LLC |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=528189 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181119221350/https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=528189 |archive-date=November 19, 2018 |access-date=November 19, 2018}}</ref>
| area_served =
{{Collapsible list
|title='''Latin America'''
|1=Mexico
|2=Central America
|3=Dominican Republic
|4=Brazil
|5=Argentina
|6=Paraguay
|7=Uruguay
|8=Peru
|9=Venezuela
|10=Colombia
|11=Chile
|12=Bolivia
|13=Ecuador
}}
{{Collapsible list
|title='''Caribbean'''
| 1=Barbados
| 2=Guyana
| 3=Trinidad and Tobago
}}
| key_people = Lori Lee<br />(CEO)
| industry = Telecommunication
| products =Wireless<br />Satellite television
| revenue = {{decrease}} US$7 billion (2018)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Archived copy |url=https://about.att.com/pages/company_profile |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181115142341/https://about.att.com/pages/company_profile |archive-date=November 15, 2018 |access-date=November 19, 2018}}</ref>
| parent = AT&T
| subsid = AT&T Mexico<br />Vrio (company)|Vrio
| website = {{URL|https://www.att.com/}}
}}


AT&T Latin America (formerly AT&T International, Inc.) is a wholly owned division of AT&T which operates in Mexico and 11 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.<ref>{{Cite web |date=June 14, 2018 |title=AT&T Completes Acquisition of Time Warner Inc. |url=https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180614006343/en/ATT-Completes-Acquisition-Time-Warner |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180930094721/https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180614006343/en/ATT-Completes-Acquisition-Time-Warner |archive-date=September 30, 2018 |access-date=November 19, 2018 |website=www.businesswire.com}}</ref>
AT&T Latin America (formerly AT&T International, Inc.) is a wholly owned division of AT&T which operates in Mexico and 11 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.


In 2017, AT&T announced a new AT&T International corporate division housing AT&T Mexico, DirecTV Latin America and their stakes of SKY Brazil and Sky Mexico.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Spangler |first=Todd |date=June 14, 2018 |title=AT&T Completes $85B Acquisition Of Time Warner |language=en-US |work=Deadline |url=https://deadline.com/2018/06/att-completes-time-warner-acquisition-1202411103/ |url-status=live |access-date=November 19, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181119214347/https://deadline.com/2018/06/att-completes-time-warner-acquisition-1202411103/ |archive-date=November 19, 2018}}</ref>
In 2017, AT&T announced a new AT&T International corporate division housing AT&T Mexico, DirecTV Latin America and their stakes of SKY Brazil and Sky Mexico.


In October 2016, AT&T announced a deal to acquire Time Warner worth $85.4 billion (including assumed Time Warner debt). The proposed deal would give AT&T significant holdings in the media industry; AT&T's competitor Comcast had previously acquired NBCUniversal in a similar bid to increase its media holdings, in concert with its ownership of television and internet providers. If approved by federal regulators, the merger would bring Time Warner's properties under the same umbrella as AT&T's telecommunication holdings, including satellite provider DirecTV.<ref name="advancedtalksa" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Littleton |first=Cynthia |date=October 22, 2016 |title=AT&T Sets $85.4 Billion Time Warner Deal, CEOs Talks 'Unique' Potential of Combination |url=https://variety.com/2016/biz/news/att-time-warner-deal-1201897938/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161023204133/http://variety.com/2016/biz/news/att-time-warner-deal-1201897938/ |archive-date=October 23, 2016 |access-date=October 23, 2016 |website=Variety (magazine)|Variety}}</ref>
In October 2016, AT&T announced a deal to acquire Time Warner worth $85.4 billion (including assumed Time Warner debt). The proposed deal would give AT&T significant holdings in the media industry; AT&T's competitor Comcast had previously acquired NBCUniversal in a similar bid to increase its media holdings, in concert with its ownership of television and internet providers. If approved by federal regulators, the merger would bring Time Warner's properties under the same umbrella as AT&T's telecommunication holdings, including satellite provider DirecTV.
<ref>{{Cite news |title=AT&T agrees to buy Time Warner for $85.4 billion |language=en |work=USA TODAY |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/10/22/reports-t-agrees-buy-time-warner-more-than-80b/92589816/ |url-status=live |access-date=August 8, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161023013659/http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/10/22/reports-t-agrees-buy-time-warner-more-than-80b/92589816/ |archive-date=October 23, 2016}}</ref>


By the end of July, the company announced that, effective August 1, a new structure was created before the acquisition would close. On September 15, 2017, Reuters reported, citing anonymous sources, that AT&T, the owner of DIRECTV's U.S. and Latin American divisions, had hired an advisor to consider offering AT&T Latin America on the public stock market. In November 2017, the United States Department of Justice|U.S. Justice Department said it was moving to sue to block the AT&T-Time Warner merger.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Kang |first1=Cecilia |last2=Merced |first2=Michael J. de la |date=November 20, 2017 |title=Justice Department Sues to Block AT&T-Time Warner Merger |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/business/dealbook/att-time-warner-merger.html |url-status=live |access-date=December 11, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171211123601/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/business/dealbook/att-time-warner-merger.html |archive-date=December 11, 2017 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> On November 20, 2017, the Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit over the acquisition; Makan Delrahim stated that the deal would "greatly harm American consumers". AT&T asserts that this suit is a "radical and inexplicable departure from decades of antitrust precedent".<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Foden |first1=Sara |last2=McLaughlin |first2=David |last3=Moritz |first3=Scott |date=November 20, 2017 |title=AT&T Sued by U.S. Seeking to Block Merger With Time Warner |work=Bloomberg |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-20/at-t-is-said-to-face-u-s-antitrust-lawsuit-over-time-warner |url-status=live |access-date=November 20, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171120214748/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-20/at-t-is-said-to-face-u-s-antitrust-lawsuit-over-time-warner |archive-date=November 20, 2017}}</ref> On December 22, 2017, the merger agreement deadline was extended to June 21, 2018.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Littleton |first=Cynthia |date=December 22, 2017 |title=AT&T, Time Warner Extend Merger Agreement Deadline as Trial Looms |work=Variety |url=https://variety.com/2017/biz/news/att-time-warner-extend-merger-agreement-june-21-trial-1202647896/ |url-status=live |access-date=December 22, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171224031351/http://variety.com/2017/biz/news/att-time-warner-extend-merger-agreement-june-21-trial-1202647896/ |archive-date=December 24, 2017}}</ref> On April 19, 2018, the IPO was cancelled. On June 12, 2018, the AT&T-Time Warner merger was approved by a federal judge.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Johnson |first=Ted |date=June 12, 2018 |title=AT&T-Time Warner Merger Approved |work=Variety |url=https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/att-time-warner-merger-approved-1202840369/ |url-status=live |access-date=June 12, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612215708/https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/att-time-warner-merger-approved-1202840369/ |archive-date=June 12, 2018}}</ref> Two days later, AT&T completed the acquisition of Time Warner, and a day later, the company was renamed WarnerMedia.
By the end of July, the company announced that, effective August 1, a new structure was created before the acquisition would close. On September 15, 2017, Reuters reported, citing anonymous sources, that AT&T, the owner of DIRECTV's U.S. and Latin American divisions, had hired an advisor to consider offering AT&T Latin America on the public stock market. In November 2017, the United States Department of Justice|U.S. Justice Department said it was moving to sue to block the AT&T-Time Warner merger. On November 20, 2017, the Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit over the acquisition; Makan Delrahim stated that the deal would "greatly harm American consumers". AT&T asserts that this suit is a "radical and inexplicable departure from decades of antitrust precedent". On December 22, 2017, the merger agreement deadline was extended to June 21, 2018. On April 19, 2018, the IPO was cancelled. On June 12, 2018, the AT&T-Time Warner merger was approved by a federal judge. Two days later, AT&T completed the acquisition of Time Warner, and a day later, the company was renamed WarnerMedia.


On September 21, 2018, AT&T reclassified its four principal divisions which include AT&T International which now have some assets moved out like the RSNs, and also merging Consumer Mobility, Technology, and Business Mobility and renamed the company as AT&T Latin America.<ref name="otp.tools.investis.com" />
On September 21, 2018, AT&T reclassified its four principal divisions which include AT&T International which now have some assets moved out like the RSNs, and also merging Consumer Mobility, Technology, and Business Mobility and renamed the company as AT&T Latin America.


In October 2019, AT&T Latin America announced its intention to sell their Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands operations to Liberty Latin America, as a result of shareholder pressure from Elliott Management.<ref>{{Cite news |last=McNary |first=Dave |date=October 9, 2019 |title=AT&T Selling Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands Operations to Reduce Debt |work=Variety |url=https://variety.com/2019/digital/news/att-selling-puerto-rico-virgin-islands-debt-1203364718/ |access-date=July 4, 2020}}</ref>
In October 2019, AT&T Latin America announced its intention to sell their Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands operations to Liberty Latin America, as a result of shareholder pressure from Elliott Management.


== Landline operating companies ==
== Landline operating companies ==
Of the eight companies that were part of the Breakup of the Bell System, these five are a part of the current AT&T:<ref>{{Cite web |title=Agreements Between SNET America, Inc. (SAI) DBA AT&T Long Distance East, and AT&T Telephone Companies |url=http://www.att.com/gen/public-affairs?pid=8101 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011214558/http://att.com/gen/public-affairs?pid=8101 |archive-date=October 11, 2007 |access-date=September 29, 2007 |publisher=AT&T}}</ref>
Of the eight companies that were part of the Breakup of the Bell System, these five are a part of the current AT&T:
* Ameritech, acquired by SBC in 1999
* Ameritech, acquired by SBC in 1999
* AT&T Corp., acquired by SBC in 2005
* AT&T Corp., acquired by SBC in 2005
Line 128: Line 98:
* Pacific Telesis, acquired by SBC in 1997
* Pacific Telesis, acquired by SBC in 1997
* Southwestern Bell, rebranded as SBC Communications in 1995
* Southwestern Bell, rebranded as SBC Communications in 1995
=== Chart of AT&T Baby Bells ===
{{Main|Regional Bell Operating Company}}
{{AT&T chart}} <!-- To edit go to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:AT%26T_chart -->


=== Former operating companies ===
=== Former operating companies ===
The following companies have become defunct or were sold under SBC/AT&T ownership:
The following companies have become defunct or were sold under SBC/AT&T ownership:
* Southern New England Telephone: sold to Frontier Communications in 2014<ref>{{Cite news |title=Dan Haar column: AT&T Selling Connecticut Operations to Frontier |language=en |work=tribunedigital-thecourant |url=http://articles.courant.com/2013-12-17/business/hc-haar-snet-att-frontier-merger-20131217_1_frontier-communications-connecticut-operations-wireline |url-status=live |access-date=June 8, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170813122833/http://articles.courant.com/2013-12-17/business/hc-haar-snet-att-frontier-merger-20131217_1_frontier-communications-connecticut-operations-wireline |archive-date=August 13, 2017}}</ref>
* Southern New England Telephone: sold to Frontier Communications in 2014
**Woodbury Telephone: merged into Southern New England Telephone on June 1, 2007.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dan Haar |date=October 23, 1996 |title=SNET To Buy Woodbury Telephone |url=http://articles.courant.com/1996-10-23/business/9610230018_1_snet-woodbury-s-president-woodbury-telephone |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120319150626/http://articles.courant.com/1996-10-23/business/9610230018_1_snet-woodbury-s-president-woodbury-telephone |archive-date=March 19, 2012 |access-date=March 9, 2018 |publisher=The Hartford Courant}}</ref>
**Woodbury Telephone: merged into Southern New England Telephone on June 1, 2007.


=== Decline of rural landlines ===
=== Decline of rural landlines ===
Of the Baby Bells, Ameritech sold some of its Wisconsin landlines to CenturyTel, in 1998; BellSouth sold some of its lines to MebTel, during the 2000s; US West|U S WEST sold many historically Bell landlines to Lynch Communications and Pacific Telecom, in the 1990s; Verizon sold many of its Verizon New England|New England lines to FairPoint Communications|FairPoint, in 2008, and its Frontier West Virginia|West Virginia operations to Frontier Communications, in 2010.
Of the Baby Bells, Ameritech sold some of its Wisconsin landlines to CenturyTel, in 1998; BellSouth sold some of its lines to MebTel, during the 2000s; US West|U S WEST sold many historically Bell landlines to Lynch Communications and Pacific Telecom, in the 1990s; Verizon sold many of its Verizon New England|New England lines to FairPoint Communications|FairPoint, in 2008, and its Frontier West Virginia|West Virginia operations to Frontier Communications, in 2010.


On October 25, 2014, Frontier Communications took over control of the AT&T landline network in Connecticut after being approved by state utility regulators. The deal was worth about $2 billion, and included Frontier inheriting about 2,500 of AT&T's employees and many of AT&T's buildings.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Turmelle |first=Luther |date=October 24, 2014 |title=Frontier takes over AT&T landline service Saturday |url=http://www.nhregister.com/business/20141024/frontier-takes-over-att-landline-service-saturday |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303231938/http://www.nhregister.com/business/20141024/frontier-takes-over-att-landline-service-saturday |archive-date=March 3, 2016 |access-date=January 7, 2016 |website=New Haven Register}}</ref>
On October 25, 2014, Frontier Communications took over control of the AT&T landline network in Connecticut after being approved by state utility regulators. The deal was worth about $2 billion, and included Frontier inheriting about 2,500 of AT&T's employees and many of AT&T's buildings.


== Corporate structure ==
File:AT&TOrange.JPG|thumb|AT&T office in San Antonio, Texas


=== Facilities and regions ===
=== Facilities and regions ===
{{expand section|date=November 2016}}
The company is headquartered at Whitacre Tower in downtown Dallas, Texas.<ref name="Jbodonkor" /> On June 27, 2008, AT&T announced that it would move its corporate headquarters from downtown San Antonio to One AT&T Plaza in downtown Dallas.<ref name="Jbodonkor" /><ref>"[http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=1916 Corporate Inquiries] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090319011856/http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=1916 |date=March 19, 2009}}." ''AT&T''. Retrieved March 25, 2009.</ref> The company said that it moved to gain better access to its customers and operations throughout the world, and to the key technology partners, suppliers, innovation and human resources needed as it continues to grow, domestically and internationally.<ref>{{Cite web |date=June 27, 2008 |title=AT&T moving headquarters to Dallas from San Antonio |url=http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/062808dnbusattmove.4515fb49.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080704013741/http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/062808dnbusattmove.4515fb49.html |archive-date=July 4, 2008 |publisher=Dallas News}}</ref> AT&T Inc. previously relocated its corporate headquarters to San Antonio from St. Louis, Missouri, in 1992, when it was then named Southwestern Bell Corporation. The company's Telecom Operations group, which serves residential and regional business customers in 22 U.S. states, remains in San Antonio.{{Citation needed|date=June 2009}} Atlanta, Georgia, continues to be the headquarters for AT&T Mobility, with significant offices in Redmond, Washington, the former home of AT&T Wireless Services|AT&T Wireless. Bedminster, New Jersey, is the headquarters for the company's Global Business Services group and AT&T Labs and is where the original AT&T Corp. remains located. St. Louis continues as home to the company's Directory operations, AT&T Advertising Solutions.<ref>AT&T – News Room (June 27, 2008). [http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=25882 AT&T Corporate Headquarters to Move to Dallas] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080828161432/http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=25882 |date=August 28, 2008}}. Press release. Retrieved June 27, 2008.</ref> As announced by its predecessor Time Warner in 2013,  WarnerMedia, an AT&T subsidiary acquired in 2016, is headquartered in the 30 Hudson Yards tower, located in New York City.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Weiss |first=Lois |date=June 5, 2013 |title=TW is at Center of hot attention |url=https://nypost.com/2013/06/05/tw-is-at-center-of-hot-attention/ |access-date=May 11, 2020 |website=New York Post |language=en}}</ref>


AT&T also offers services in many locations throughout the Asia-Pacific|Asia Pacific; its regional headquarters is located in Hong Kong.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Corp.att.com |url=http://www.corp.att.com/ap/about/where/hk/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111126131243/http://www.corp.att.com/ap/about/where/hk/ |archive-date=November 26, 2011 |access-date=November 28, 2011 |publisher=Corp.att.com}}</ref> The company is also active in Mexico, and on November 7, 2014, it was announced that Mexican carrier Iusacell would be acquired by AT&T.<ref name="androidcentral.com" /> The acquisition was approved in January 2015.{{citation needed|date=November 2016}}<ref>Roger Cheng, CNET. "[https://www.cnet.com/news/done-deal-at-t-closes-2-5-billion-purchase-of-mexicos-iusacell/ Done deal: AT&T closes $2.5 billion purchase of Mexico's Iusacell] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180105123138/https://www.cnet.com/news/done-deal-at-t-closes-2-5-billion-purchase-of-mexicos-iusacell/ |date=January 5, 2018}}." January 16, 2015. Retrieved January 4, 2018.</ref><ref>Phil Goldstein, FierceWireless. "[https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/at-t-closes-2-5b-deal-for-mexican-operator-iusacell AT&T closes $2.5B deal for Mexican operator Iusacell] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180105180413/https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/at-t-closes-2-5b-deal-for-mexican-operator-iusacell |date=January 5, 2018}}." January 16, 2015. Retrieved January 4, 2018.</ref> On April 30, 2015, AT&T acquired wireless operations Nextel Mexico from NII Holdings (now AT&T Mexico).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Meyer |first=Dan |date=April 25, 2015 |title=AT&T bolsters Mexico operations with closing of Nextel Mexico deal |url=http://www.rcrwireless.com/20150430/carriers/att-bolsters-mexico-operations-with-closing-of-nextel-mexico-deal-tag2 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161024221135/http://www.rcrwireless.com/20150430/carriers/att-bolsters-mexico-operations-with-closing-of-nextel-mexico-deal-tag2 |archive-date=October 24, 2016 |access-date=October 24, 2016 |website=RCR Wireless News}}</ref>
The company is headquartered at Whitacre Tower in downtown Dallas, Texas. The company said that it moved to gain better access to its customers and operations throughout the world, and to the key technology partners, suppliers, innovation and human resources needed as it continues to grow, domestically and internationally. AT&T Inc. previously relocated its corporate headquarters to San Antonio from St. Louis, Missouri, in 1992, when it was then named Southwestern Bell Corporation. The company's Telecom Operations group, which serves residential and regional business customers in 22 U.S. states, remains in San Antonio. Atlanta, Georgia, continues to be the headquarters for AT&T Mobility, with significant offices in Redmond, Washington, the former home of AT&T Wireless Services|AT&T Wireless. Bedminster, New Jersey, is the headquarters for the company's Global Business Services group and AT&T Labs and is where the original AT&T Corp. remains located. St. Louis continues as home to the company's Directory operations, AT&T Advertising Solutions. As announced by its predecessor Time Warner in 2013,  WarnerMedia, an AT&T subsidiary acquired in 2016, is headquartered in the 30 Hudson Yards tower, located in New York City.
 
AT&T also offers services in many locations throughout the Asia-Pacific|Asia Pacific; its regional headquarters is located in Hong Kong. The company is also active in Mexico, and on November 7, 2014, it was announced that Mexican carrier Iusacell would be acquired by AT&T. On April 30, 2015, AT&T acquired wireless operations Nextel Mexico from NII Holdings (now AT&T Mexico).


=== Corporate governance ===
=== Corporate governance ===
File:Randall Stephenson, CEO of AT&T.jpg|thumb|CEO Randall L. Stephenson at the 2008 World Economic Forum
 
{{See also|Category:AT&T people}}
AT&T's current board of directors as of 2021 May
AT&T's current board of directors {{as of|2021|May|lc=y|df=US}}:<ref name="bodirectorso">{{cite web |title=Board of Directors |url=https://investors.att.com/corporate-governance/board-of-directors |website=AT&T |publisher=AT&T |access-date=15 May 2021}}</ref>
 
{{columns-list|colwidth=300px|rules=yes|
* William E. Kennard – Chairperson|chairman
* William E. Kennard – Chairperson|chairman
* Samuel A. DiPiazza, Jr.
* Samuel A. DiPiazza, Jr.
Line 169: Line 132:
* Cynthia B. Taylor
* Cynthia B. Taylor
* Geoffrey Y. Yang
* Geoffrey Y. Yang
}}


The current management {{as of|2021|April|lc=y|df=}} includes:<ref>{{Cite web |last=[https://investors.att.com/ AT&T Inc. Investor Relations] |title=Leadership |url=https://investors.att.com/corporate-governance/leadership |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190808003951/https://investors.att.com/corporate-governance/leadership |archive-date=August 8, 2019 |access-date=September 4, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= Trentmann |first= Nina |date= November 17, 2020  |url= https://www.wsj.com/articles/longtime-at-t-finance-chief-john-stephens-to-retire-next-spring-11605648011 |title= Longtime AT&T Finance Chief John Stephens to Retire Next Spring |publisher= The Wall Street Journal |accessdate= April 22, 2021 |quote= AT&T Inc. hired a company insider to succeed longtime finance chief John Stephens once he retires at the end of March, in the latest change of guard within the company’s leadership over the past year. The Dallas-based telecommunications company Tuesday said Pascal Desroches would become chief financial officer April 1. Mr. Desroches is now CFO of AT&T’s WarnerMedia division and previously worked in various finance roles at the entertainment company.}}</ref>
 
The current management as of 2021 April includes:
* John Stankey – Chief Executive Officer|CEO
* John Stankey – Chief Executive Officer|CEO
* Ed Gillespie – senior executive vice president of external and legislative affairs
* Ed Gillespie – senior executive vice president of external and legislative affairs
Line 183: Line 146:


== Political involvement ==
== Political involvement ==
{{Update section|date=June 2018}}
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, AT&T was the fourteenth-largest donor to United States federal political campaigns and committees from 1989 to 2019,<ref name="osorghh2011">{{Cite web |year=2020 |title=Top Organization Contributors |url=https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php?cycle=ALL |access-date=January 2, 2020 |website=OpenSecrets.org |publisher=Center for Responsive Politics |location=United States}}</ref> having contributed more than {{US$|84.1 million}}, 58% of which went to Republican Party (United States)|Republicans and 42% of which went to Democratic Party (United States)|Democrats. As an example, in 2005, AT&T was among 53 entities that contributed the maximum of $250,000 to the second inauguration of President George W. Bush.<ref name="drinkard2005">{{Cite news |last=Drinkard |first=Jim |date=January 17, 2005 |title=Donors get good seats, great access this week |work=USA Today |url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-16-inauguration-donors_x.htm |url-status=live |access-date=May 25, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120628235354/http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-16-inauguration-donors_x.htm |archive-date=June 28, 2012}}</ref><ref name="usatoday25may2008">{{Cite news |date=January 16, 2005 |title=Financing the inauguration |work=USA Today |url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-16-inaugural-donors_x.htm |url-status=live |access-date=May 25, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120628235320/http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-16-inaugural-donors_x.htm |archive-date=June 28, 2012}}</ref><ref name="AP25may2005">{{Cite news |date=January 14, 2005 |title=Some question inaugural's multi-million price tag |work=USA Today |agency=Associated Press |url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-14-price_x.htm |url-status=live |access-date=May 25, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120628235330/http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-14-price_x.htm |archive-date=June 28, 2012}}</ref> Bill Leahy, representing AT&T, sits on the Private Enterprise Board of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).<ref>{{Cite web |title=Private Enterprise Board &#124; ALEC – American Legislative Exchange Council |url=http://www.alec.org/about-alec/private-enterprise-board/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120511000739/http://www.alec.org/about-alec/private-enterprise-board/ |archive-date=May 11, 2012 |access-date=May 11, 2012 |publisher=Alec.org}}</ref> ALEC is a nonprofit organization of conservatism in the United States|conservative state legislature (United States)|state legislators and private sector representatives that drafts and shares model state-level legislation for distribution among state governments in the United States.<ref>{{Cite news |last=May, Clifford |date=August 30, 1987 |title=Transportation Chief Attacks Congress on Safety |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/30/us/transportation-chief-attacks-congress-on-safety.html |url-status=live |access-date=February 4, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170813143739/http://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/30/us/transportation-chief-attacks-congress-on-safety.html |archive-date=August 13, 2017}}</ref><ref name="fcir">{{Cite news |last=Goodman |first=Howard |date=March 23, 2013 |title=NRA's Behind-the-Scenes Campaign Encouraged 'Stand Your Ground' Adoption |publisher=Florida Center for Investigative Reporting |url=http://fcir.org/2012/03/23/nras-behind-the-scenes-campaign-encouraged-stand-your-ground-adoption-across-the-country/ |url-status=live |access-date=November 17, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160404154558/http://fcir.org/2012/03/23/nras-behind-the-scenes-campaign-encouraged-stand-your-ground-adoption-across-the-country/ |archive-date=April 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Griffin |first=Marshall |date=January 14, 2014 |title='Right-to-work' bill praised and blasted in House committee hearing |publisher=KBIA |url=http://kbia.org/post/right-work-bill-praised-and-blasted-house-committee-hearing |url-status=live |access-date=November 12, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160311233732/http://kbia.org/post/right-work-bill-praised-and-blasted-house-committee-hearing |archive-date=March 11, 2016}}</ref>


During the period of 1998 to 2019, the company expended {{US$|380.1 million}} on lobbying in the United States.<ref name="osorgatt2019">{{Cite web |year=2020 |title=AT&T Inc: Summary |url=https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000076&cycle=A |access-date=January 2, 2020 |website=OpenSecrets.org |publisher=Center for Responsive Politics |location=United States}}</ref> A key political issue for AT&T has been the question of which businesses win the right to profit by providing broadband internet access in the United States.<ref name="osorgatt2007">{{Cite web |title=AT&T Inc |url=http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.asp?ID=D000000076&Name=AT%26T+Inc |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930035728/http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.asp?ID=D000000076&Name=AT&T+Inc |archive-date=September 30, 2007 |access-date=September 29, 2007 |publisher=The Center For Responsive Politics}}</ref> The company has also lobbied in support of several federal bills. AT&T supported the Federal Communications Commission Process Reform Act of 2013 (H.R. 3675; 113th Congress), a bill that would make a number of changes to procedures that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) follows in its rulemaking processes.<ref name="3675cbo">{{Cite web |title=H.R. 3675 - CBO |url=http://www.cbo.gov/publication/45057 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140312212828/http://www.cbo.gov/publication/45057 |archive-date=March 12, 2014 |access-date=March 10, 2014 |publisher=Congressional Budget Office}}</ref> The FCC would have to act in a more transparent way as a result of this bill, forced to accept public input about regulations.<ref name="PeteVotesTransparency">{{Cite news |last=Kasperowicz |first=Pete |date=March 11, 2014 |title=House votes for more transparency at the FCC |work=The Hill |url=http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/votes/200503-house-votes-for-more-transparency-at-the-fcc |url-status=live |access-date=March 12, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140312074500/http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/votes/200503-house-votes-for-more-transparency-at-the-fcc |archive-date=March 12, 2014}}</ref> AT&T's Executive Vice President of Federal Relations, Tim McKone, said that the bill's "much needed institutional reforms will help arm the agency with the tools to keep pace with the Internet speed of today's marketplace. It will also ensure that outmoded regulatory practices for today's competitive marketplace are properly placed in the dustbin of history."<ref name="ATTblog">{{Cite web |last=McKone |first=Tim |date=December 11, 2013 |title=AT&T Statement on Bipartisan Spectrum and FCC Reform Legislation |url=http://www.attpublicpolicy.com/fcc/att-statement-on-bipartisan-spectrum-and-fcc-reform-legislation/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140312225128/http://www.attpublicpolicy.com/fcc/att-statement-on-bipartisan-spectrum-and-fcc-reform-legislation/ |archive-date=March 12, 2014 |access-date=March 12, 2014 |publisher=AT&T Public Policy Blog}}</ref>
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, AT&T was the fourteenth-largest donor to United States federal political campaigns and committees from 1989 to 2019, having contributed more than US$84.1 million, 58% of which went to Republican Party (United States)|Republicans and 42% of which went to Democratic Party (United States)|Democrats. As an example, in 2005, AT&T was among 53 entities that contributed the maximum of $250,000 to the second inauguration of President George W. Bush. Bill Leahy, representing AT&T, sits on the Private Enterprise Board of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). ALEC is a nonprofit organization of conservatism in the United States|conservative state legislature (United States)|state legislators and private sector representatives that drafts and shares model state-level legislation for distribution among state governments in the United States.


In May 2018, reports emerged that AT&T made 12 monthly payments between January and December 2017 to Essential Consultants, a company set up by President Donald Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen (lawyer)|Michael Cohen, totaling $600,000.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Bartz |first=Diane |date=May 9, 2018 |title=AT&T payments to Trump lawyer more than reported |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-daniels-at-t/att-payments-to-trump-lawyer-more-than-reported-source-idUSKBN1IA2KK |url-status=live |access-date=May 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180509222116/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-daniels-at-t/att-payments-to-trump-lawyer-more-than-reported-source-idUSKBN1IA2KK |archive-date=May 9, 2018}}</ref> Although initial reports on May 8 mentioned only four monthly payments totaling $200,000,<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Mangan |first1=Dan |last2=Breuninger |first2=Kevin |last3=Ruggiero |first3=Ryan |date=May 8, 2018 |title=AT&T confirms it paid Trump lawyer Michael Cohen for 'insights' on administration |work=CNBC |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/08/att-confirms-it-paid-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-for-insights-on-administration.html |url-status=live |access-date=May 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180510005726/https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/08/att-confirms-it-paid-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-for-insights-on-administration.html |archive-date=May 10, 2018}}</ref> documents obtained by the ''The Washington Post|Washington Post'' on May 10 confirmed the figure of 12 payments, which had begun three days after the President was Inauguration of Donald Trump|sworn into office.<ref name=":1">{{Cite news |last1=Helderman |first1=Rosalind S. |last2=Fung |first2=Brian |last3=Hamburger |first3=Tom |date=May 10, 2018 |title=Cohen's $600,000 deal with AT&T specified he would advise on Time Warner merger, internal company records show |language=en-US |work=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cohens-600000-deal-with-atandt-specified-he-would-advise-on-time-warner-merger-internal-company-records-show/2018/05/10/cd541ae0-5468-11e8-a551-5b648abe29ef_story.html |url-status=live |access-date=May 11, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180511000608/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cohens-600000-deal-with-atandt-specified-he-would-advise-on-time-warner-merger-internal-company-records-show/2018/05/10/cd541ae0-5468-11e8-a551-5b648abe29ef_story.html |archive-date=May 11, 2018 |issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news |last=Wang |first=Christine |date=May 10, 2018 |title=AT&T reportedly paid Michael Cohen for guidance on Time Warner deal |work=CNBC |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/10/att-reportedly-paid-michael-cohen-for-guidance-on-time-warner-deal.html |url-status=live |access-date=May 11, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180511012806/https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/10/att-reportedly-paid-michael-cohen-for-guidance-on-time-warner-deal.html |archive-date=May 11, 2018}}</ref> AT&T confirmed the report the same day.<ref name=":02">{{Cite news |last=Gold |first=Hadas |date=May 10, 2018 |title=AT&T confirms it paid Michael Cohen for consulting on Time Warner deal |work=CNNMoney |url=https://money.cnn.com/2018/05/10/media/att-michael-cohen/index.html |url-status=live |access-date=May 11, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180511063705/https://money.cnn.com/2018/05/10/media/att-michael-cohen/index.html |archive-date=May 11, 2018}}</ref> The report from ''The Washington Post'', as well as additional reporting from Bloomberg News|Bloomberg, revealed the payments had been made for Cohen to "provide guidance" relating to the attempted $85 billion merger with Time Warner,<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":0" /> to gain information on the Trump administration's planned tax reforms, as well as about potential changes to Net neutrality in the United States|net neutrality policies under the new FCC.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Turner |first1=Nick |last2=Moritz |first2=Scott |date=May 9, 2018 |title=AT&T Was Paying Trump's Lawyer While White House Turned Into Foe |work=Bloomberg |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-09/at-t-was-paying-trump-s-lawyer-as-administration-turned-into-foe |url-status=live |access-date=May 22, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180522181322/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-09/at-t-was-paying-trump-s-lawyer-as-administration-turned-into-foe |archive-date=May 22, 2018}}</ref> However, Chairman of the FCC Ajit Pai denied Cohen ever inquired about net neutrality on AT&T's behalf.<ref name=":02" /><ref>{{Cite news |last=Shields |first=Todd |date=May 10, 2018 |title='No' Cohen Inquiries on Net Neutrality on AT&T's Behalf, FCC Chairman Says |work=Bloomberg |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-10/-no-cohen-inquiries-to-fcc-on-net-neutrality-on-at-t-s-behalf |url-status=live |access-date=May 22, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180522181328/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-10/-no-cohen-inquiries-to-fcc-on-net-neutrality-on-at-t-s-behalf |archive-date=May 22, 2018}}</ref> A spokesperson for AT&T said that the company had been contacted by Special Counsel investigation (2017–present)|the Special Counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller regarding the payments, and had provided all the information requested in November and December 2017.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Thomas |first1=Katie |last2=Kang |first2=Cecilia |date=May 9, 2018 |title=Novartis and AT&T Spoke to Mueller's Office About Payments to Michael Cohen |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/business/novartis-att-cohen-mueller.html |url-status=live |access-date=May 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180509220529/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/business/novartis-att-cohen-mueller.html |archive-date=May 9, 2018 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Mangan |first1=Dan |last2=Ruggiero |first2=Ryan |date=May 9, 2018 |title=AT&T says it was contacted by special counsel's office about Michael Cohen |work=CNBC |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/09/att-paid-trump-lawyer-cohen-up-to-6000000.html |url-status=live |access-date=May 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180509231719/https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/09/att-paid-trump-lawyer-cohen-up-to-6000000.html |archive-date=May 9, 2018}}</ref>
During the period of 1998 to 2019, the company expended {{US$|380.1 million}} on lobbying in the United States. A key political issue for AT&T has been the question of which businesses win the right to profit by providing broadband internet access in the United States. The company has also lobbied in support of several federal bills. AT&T supported the Federal Communications Commission Process Reform Act of 2013 (H.R. 3675; 113th Congress), a bill that would make a number of changes to procedures that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) follows in its rulemaking processes. The FCC would have to act in a more transparent way as a result of this bill, forced to accept public input about regulations. AT&T's Executive Vice President of Federal Relations, Tim McKone, said that the bill's "much needed institutional reforms will help arm the agency with the tools to keep pace with the Internet speed of today's marketplace. It will also ensure that outmoded regulatory practices for today's competitive marketplace are properly placed in the dustbin of history."


In early 2019, the Democratic United States House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary requested records related to the AT&T-Time Warner merger from the White House.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cristiano Lima |date=April 16, 2019 |title=White House denies House Democrats' AT&T-Time Warner records request |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/16/time-warner-merger-justice-department-1278013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190416211241/https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/16/time-warner-merger-justice-department-1278013 |archive-date=April 16, 2019 |access-date=April 16, 2019 |website=Politico.com}}</ref>
In May 2018, reports emerged that AT&T made 12 monthly payments between January and December 2017 to Essential Consultants, a company set up by President Donald Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen (lawyer)|Michael Cohen, totaling $600,000. Although initial reports on May 8 mentioned only four monthly payments totaling $200,000, documents obtained by the ''The Washington Post|Washington Post'' on May 10 confirmed the figure of 12 payments, which had begun three days after the President was Inauguration of Donald Trump|sworn into office. AT&T confirmed the report the same day. The report from ''The Washington Post'', as well as additional reporting from Bloomberg News|Bloomberg, revealed the payments had been made for Cohen to "provide guidance" relating to the attempted $85 billion merger with Time Warner, to gain information on the Trump administration's planned tax reforms, as well as about potential changes to Net neutrality in the United States|net neutrality policies under the new FCC. However, Chairman of the FCC Ajit Pai denied Cohen ever inquired about net neutrality on AT&T's behalf. A spokesperson for AT&T said that the company had been contacted by Special Counsel investigation (2017–present)|the Special Counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller regarding the payments, and had provided all the information requested in November and December 2017.
 
In early 2019, the Democratic United States House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary requested records related to the AT&T-Time Warner merger from the White House.


== Historical financial performance ==
== Historical financial performance ==
The financial performance of the company is reported to shareholders on an annual basis and a matter of public record. Where performance has been restated, the most recent statement of performance from an annual report is used.<ref name="AR-2015">{{Cite web |title=Annual Report 2015 |url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000073271716000147/ex13.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160513140909/http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000073271716000147/ex13.htm |archive-date=May 13, 2016 |access-date=June 8, 2016 |publisher=AT&T Inc. |language=en}}</ref><ref name="AR-2014">{{Cite web |title=Annual Report - 2014 |url=http://www.att.com/Investor/ATT_Annual/2014/downloads/att_ar2014_annualreport.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923180019/http://www.att.com/Investor/ATT_Annual/2014/downloads/att_ar2014_annualreport.pdf |archive-date=September 23, 2015 |access-date=November 17, 2015 |publisher=AT&T Inc. |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=March 1, 2006 |title=SEC Filings — Form K-10 - 2005 |url=http://services.corporate-ir.net/SEC/Document.Service?id=P3VybD1hSFIwY0RvdkwyRndhUzUwWlc1cmQybDZZWEprTG1OdmJTOWtiM2R1Ykc5aFpDNXdhSEEvWVdOMGFXOXVQVkJFUmlacGNHRm5aVDAwTURBd09ESTFKbk4xWW5OcFpEMDFOdz09JnR5cGU9MiZmbj1BVFRJbmMucGRm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170813123410/http://services.corporate-ir.net/SEC/Document.Service?id=P3VybD1hSFIwY0RvdkwyRndhUzUwWlc1cmQybDZZWEprTG1OdmJTOWtiM2R1Ykc5aFpDNXdhSEEvWVdOMGFXOXVQVkJFUmlacGNHRm5aVDAwTURBd09ESTFKbk4xWW5OcFpEMDFOdz09JnR5cGU9MiZmbj1BVFRJbmMucGRm |archive-date=August 13, 2017 |access-date=November 18, 2015 |publisher=AT&T Inc |language=en}}</ref><ref name="10K">{{Cite web |date=February 17, 2017 |title=Annual Report 2016 |url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000073271717000021/ex13.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222054744/https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000073271717000021/ex13.htm |archive-date=February 22, 2017 |access-date=February 21, 2017 |publisher=AT&T}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=AT&T Inc. (T) Income Statement - Yahoo Finance |url=https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/T/financials/ |access-date=May 11, 2020 |website=finance.yahoo.com |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=AT&T Inc. (T) Balance Sheet - Yahoo Finance |url=https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/T/balance-sheet/ |access-date=May 11, 2020 |website=finance.yahoo.com |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=AT&T employees 2007-2018 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/220683/number-of-atundt-employees-since-2007/ |access-date=May 11, 2020 |website=Statista |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite report |author= AT&T Inc. |date= March 14, 2003 |title= Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT - 2002 |url= https://otp.tools.investis.com/clients/us/atnt2/sec/sec-show.aspx?FilingId=2204390&Cik=0000732717&Type=PDF&hasPdf=1 |page= 155 |access-date= March 22, 2021 |quote= 2002 Operating Revenues - $43,138 (dollars in millions}}</ref><ref>{{cite report |author= AT&T Inc. |date= March 14, 2003 |title= Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT - 2006 |url= https://otp.tools.investis.com/clients/us/atnt2/sec/sec-show.aspx?FilingId=4990665&Cik=0000732717&Type=PDF&hasPdf=1 |page= 312 |access-date= March 22, 2021 |quote= 2005 Net Income - $4,786 (dollars in millions}}</ref><ref>{{cite report |author= AT&T Inc. |date= February 24, 2012 |title= Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT - 2011 |url= https://otp.tools.investis.com/clients/us/atnt2/sec/sec-show.aspx?FilingId=8434955&Cik=0000732717&Type=PDF&hasPdf=1 |page= 267 |access-date= March 22, 2021 |quote= 2009 Net Income (Loss) Attributable to AT&T - $12,138 (dollars in millions}}</ref><ref>{{cite report |author= AT&T Inc. |date= February 24, 2012 |title= Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT - 2011 |url= https://otp.tools.investis.com/clients/us/atnt2/sec/sec-show.aspx?FilingId=8434955&Cik=0000732717&Type=PDF&hasPdf=1 |page= 267 |access-date= March 22, 2021 |quote= 2010 Net Income (Loss) Attributable to AT&T - $19,864 (dollars in millions}}</ref>
The financial performance of the company is reported to shareholders on an annual basis and a matter of public record. Where performance has been restated, the most recent statement of performance from an annual report is used.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Performance measurements, by year
|+ Performance measurements, by year
Line 246: Line 209:


=== Hemisphere database ===
=== Hemisphere database ===
{{main|Hemisphere Project}}
 
The company maintains a database of call detail records of all telephone calls that have passed through its network since 1987. AT&T employees work at High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area offices (operated by the Office of National Drug Control Policy) in Los Angeles, Atlanta, and Houston so data can be quickly turned over to law enforcement agencies. Records are requested via an administrative subpoena, without the involvement of a court or grand jury.
The company maintains a database of call detail records of all telephone calls that have passed through its network since 1987. AT&T employees work at High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area offices (operated by the Office of National Drug Control Policy) in Los Angeles, Atlanta, and Houston so data can be quickly turned over to law enforcement agencies. Records are requested via an administrative subpoena, without the involvement of a court or grand jury.


=== Censorship ===
=== Censorship ===
In September 2007, AT&T changed its legal policy to state that "AT&T may immediately terminate or suspend all or a portion of your Service, any Member ID, electronic mail address, IP address, Universal Resource Locator or domain name used by you, without notice for conduct that AT&T believes ... (c) tends to damage the name or reputation of AT&T, or its parents, affiliates and subsidiaries."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fisher |first=Ken |date=October 1, 2007 |title=AT&T threatens to disconnect subscribers who criticize the company |url=https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070930-att-threatens-to-disconnect-subscribers-who-are-critical-of-the-company.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081022222836/http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070930-att-threatens-to-disconnect-subscribers-who-are-critical-of-the-company.html |archive-date=October 22, 2008 |access-date=November 28, 2011 |publisher=Arstechnica.com}}</ref> By October 10, 2007, AT&T had altered the terms and conditions for its Internet service to explicitly support freedom of expression by its subscribers, after an outcry claiming the company had given itself the right to censor its subscribers' transmissions.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Martin H. Bosworth |title=AT&T Changes Terms Of Service After Outcry |url=http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/10/att_tos.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120102012925/http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/10/att_tos.html |archive-date=January 2, 2012 |access-date=November 28, 2011 |publisher=Consumeraffairs.com}}</ref>
In September 2007, AT&T changed its legal policy to state that "AT&T may immediately terminate or suspend all or a portion of your Service, any Member ID, electronic mail address, IP address, Universal Resource Locator or domain name used by you, without notice for conduct that AT&T believes ... (c) tends to damage the name or reputation of AT&T, or its parents, affiliates and subsidiaries." By October 10, 2007, AT&T had altered the terms and conditions for its Internet service to explicitly support freedom of expression by its subscribers, after an outcry claiming the company had given itself the right to censor its subscribers' transmissions.


=== Privacy controversy ===
=== Privacy controversy ===
File:Page9-SER klein exhibits.jpg|thumb|Diagram of how alleged wiretapping worked, from Electronic Frontier Foundation|EFF court filings<ref name=kleinex/>
{{further|NSA call database|Room 641A|Mark Klein|NSA warrantless surveillance controversy|Hepting v. AT&T}}
In 2006, the Electronic Frontier Foundation lodged the class action lawsuit ''Hepting v. AT&T'', which alleged that AT&T had allowed agents of the National Security Agency (NSA) to monitor phone and Internet communications of AT&T customers without warrants. If true, this would violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First and Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendments of the United States Constitution|U.S. Constitution. AT&T has yet to confirm or deny that monitoring by the NSA is occurring. In April 2006, retired former AT&T technician Mark Klein lodged an affidavit supporting this allegation.<ref>Nakashima, Ellen, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/07/AR2007110700006_pf.html "A Story of Surveillance"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101119082703/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/07/AR2007110700006_pf.html |date=November 19, 2010}}, ''The Washington Post'', November 7, 2007</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Singel |first=Ryan |date=April 7, 2006 |title=Whistle-Blower Outs NSA Spy Room |publisher=Wired |url=https://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/04/70619 |url-status=live |access-date=September 29, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080430142924/http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/04/70619 |archive-date=April 30, 2008}}</ref> The Department of Justice stated it would intervene in this lawsuit by means of State Secrets Privilege.<ref>{{Cite press release |title=Government Moves to Intervene in AT&T Surveillance Case |date=April 28, 2006 |publisher=Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) |url=https://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_04.php#004613 |access-date=September 29, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929123042/http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_04.php#004613 |archive-date=September 29, 2007 |url-status=dead}}</ref>


In July 2006, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California – in which the suit was filed – rejected a federal government motion to dismiss the case. The motion to dismiss, which invoked the State Secrets Privilege, had argued that any court review of the alleged partnership between the federal government and AT&T would harm national security. The case was immediately appealed to the Ninth Circuit. It was dismissed on June 3, 2009, citing retroactive legislation in the FISA Amendments Act|Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.eff.org/cases/hepting |title= Hepting v. AT&T |publisher= Electronic Frontier Foundation |access-date= March 23, 2021 |quote= In June of 2009, a federal judge dismissed Hepting and dozens of other lawsuits against telecoms. EFF appealed that decision but it was affirmed, and in October, 2012, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case.}}</ref><ref>Arshad Mohammed, Washington Post. "[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/20/AR2006072001792.html Judge Declines to Dismiss Lawsuit Against AT&T] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171214074204/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/20/AR2006072001792.html |date=December 14, 2017}}." July 21, 2006. Retrieved January 4, 2018.</ref>
In 2006, the Electronic Frontier Foundation lodged the class action lawsuit ''Hepting v. AT&T'', which alleged that AT&T had allowed agents of the National Security Agency (NSA) to monitor phone and Internet communications of AT&T customers without warrants. If true, this would violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First and Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendments of the United States Constitution|U.S. Constitution. AT&T has yet to confirm or deny that monitoring by the NSA is occurring. In April 2006, retired former AT&T technician Mark Klein lodged an affidavit supporting this allegation. The Department of Justice stated it would intervene in this lawsuit by means of State Secrets Privilege.
 
In July 2006, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California – in which the suit was filed – rejected a federal government motion to dismiss the case. The motion to dismiss, which invoked the State Secrets Privilege, had argued that any court review of the alleged partnership between the federal government and AT&T would harm national security. The case was immediately appealed to the Ninth Circuit. It was dismissed on June 3, 2009, citing retroactive legislation in the FISA Amendments Act|Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.


In May 2006, ''USA Today'' reported that all international and domestic calling records had been handed over to the National Security Agency by AT&T, Verizon, SBC, and BellSouth for the purpose of creating a massive NSA call database|calling database.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Cauley |first=Leslie |date=May 11, 2006 |title=NSA has massive database of Americans' phone calls |work=USA Today |url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm |url-status=live |access-date=September 29, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110223235913/http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm |archive-date=February 23, 2011}}</ref> The portions of the ''new'' AT&T that had been part of SBC Communications before November 18, 2005, were not mentioned.
In May 2006, ''USA Today'' reported that all international and domestic calling records had been handed over to the National Security Agency by AT&T, Verizon, SBC, and BellSouth for the purpose of creating a massive NSA call database|calling database. The portions of the ''new'' AT&T that had been part of SBC Communications before November 18, 2005, were not mentioned.


On June 21, 2006, the ''San Francisco Chronicle'' reported that AT&T had rewritten rules on its privacy policy. The policy, which took effect June 23, 2006, says that "AT&T – not customers – owns customers' confidential info and can use it 'to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process.'"<ref>{{Cite news |last=Lazarus |first=David |date=June 21, 2006 |title=AT&T Rewrites Rules: Your Data Isn't Yours |work=San Francisco Chronicle |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/21/BUG9VJHB9C1.DTL&hw=at&sn=002&sc=870 |url-status=live |access-date=September 29, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071112225858/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2FBUG9VJHB9C1.DTL&hw=at&sn=002&sc=870 |archive-date=November 12, 2007}}</ref>
On June 21, 2006, the ''San Francisco Chronicle'' reported that AT&T had rewritten rules on its privacy policy. The policy, which took effect June 23, 2006, says that "AT&T – not customers – owns customers' confidential info and can use it 'to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process.'"


On August 22, 2007, National Intelligence Director John Michael McConnell|Mike McConnell confirmed that AT&T was one of the telecommunications companies that assisted with the government's warrantless wire-tapping program on calls between foreign and domestic sources.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Shrader |first=Katherine |date=August 22, 2007 |title=Spy Chief Reveals Classified Surveillance Details |agency=Associated Press |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/20396282 |url-status=live |access-date=September 29, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131110221437/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/20396282/ |archive-date=November 10, 2013}}</ref>
On August 22, 2007, National Intelligence Director John Michael McConnell|Mike McConnell confirmed that AT&T was one of the telecommunications companies that assisted with the government's warrantless wire-tapping program on calls between foreign and domestic sources.


On November 8, 2007, Mark Klein, a former AT&T technician, told Keith Olbermann of MSNBC that all Internet traffic passing over AT&T lines was copied into Room 641A|a locked room at the company's San Francisco office – to which only employees with National Security Agency clearance had access.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Olbermann |first=Keith |date=November 8, 2007 |title=Whistleblower Saw AT&T Assist Bush Administration |url=http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-US&brand=msnbc&vid=297abdd5-d0dc-4617-a6c9-c482fa316b59 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071110231322/http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-US&brand=msnbc&vid=297abdd5-d0dc-4617-a6c9-c482fa316b59 |archive-date=November 10, 2007 |access-date=November 10, 2007 |publisher=MSNBC}}</ref>
On November 8, 2007, Mark Klein, a former AT&T technician, told Keith Olbermann of MSNBC that all Internet traffic passing over AT&T lines was copied into Room 641A|a locked room at the company's San Francisco office – to which only employees with National Security Agency clearance had access.


AT&T keeps for five to seven years a record of who text messages whom and the date and time, but not the content of the messages.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Svensson |first=Peter |date=September 29, 2011 |title=Document Shows How Phone Cos. Treat Private Data |url=https://phys.org/news/2011-09-document-cos-private.html |url-status=live |access-date=May 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190513134626/https://phys.org/news/2011-09-document-cos-private.html |archive-date=May 13, 2019 |quote=T-Mobile USA doesn't keep any information on Web browsing activity. Verizon, on the other hand, keeps some information for up to a year that can be used to ascertain if a particular phone visited a particular Web site. According to the sheet, Sprint Nextel Corp.'s Virgin Mobile brand keeps the text content of text messages for three months. Verizon keeps it for three to five days. None of the other carriers keep texts at all, but they keep records of who texted who for more than a year. The document says AT&T keeps for five to seven years a record of who text messages who —and when, but not the content of the messages. Virgin Mobile only keeps that data for two to three months.}}</ref>
AT&T keeps for five to seven years a record of who text messages whom and the date and time, but not the content of the messages.


AT&T has a one star privacy rating from the Electronic Frontier Foundation.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 10, 2017 |title=Who Has Your Back? Government Data Requests 2017 |url=https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-2017 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180915003333/https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-2017 |archive-date=September 15, 2018 |access-date=October 19, 2018}}</ref>
AT&T has a one star privacy rating from the Electronic Frontier Foundation.


=== Copyright enforcement ===
=== Copyright enforcement ===
In January 2008, reports emerged that the company planned to begin filtering all Internet traffic which passed through its network for intellectual property violations.<ref name="Wu">{{Cite web |last=Wu |first=Tim |date=January 16, 2008 |title=Has AT&T Lost Its Mind? A baffling proposal to filter the Internet |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2182152/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080117101450/http://www.slate.com/id/2182152/ |archive-date=January 17, 2008 |access-date=January 16, 2008 |publisher=Slate}}</ref> Media commentators speculated that if this plan was implemented, it would have led to a mass exodus of subscribers from AT&T,<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 25, 2008 |title=AT&T's Proposed Filtering Policy Is Bad News – Netiquette – NBC News |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/22829568 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204052516/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/22829568/ |archive-date=December 4, 2013 |access-date=November 28, 2011 |work=NBC News}}</ref> although Internet traffic of non-subscribers may have gone through the company's network anyway.<ref name=Wu/> Internet freedom proponents used these developments as justification for government-mandated network neutrality.
In January 2008, reports emerged that the company planned to begin filtering all Internet traffic which passed through its network for intellectual property violations. Media commentators speculated that if this plan was implemented, it would have led to a mass exodus of subscribers from AT&T, although Internet traffic of non-subscribers may have gone through the company's network anyway. Internet freedom proponents used these developments as justification for government-mandated network neutrality.


Under AT&T’s current copyright enforcement program, content owners may notify AT&T when they allege unlawful sharing of material. The program is based on IP addresses visible to content owners in peer-to-peer networks, not on filtering. AT&T has terminated the broadband service of some customers accused of copyright infringement.<ref>{{cite news |url= https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/11/att-boots-customers-off-broadband-network-to-fight-piracy/ |title= AT&T steps up copyright enforcement, kicks customers off network |publisher= Ars Technica |date= November 6, 2018 |access-date= March 23, 2021 |quote= Content owners notified us when they believed they had evidence that an Internet account was sharing copyrighted material unlawfully. Based on the notices we received, we identified the customer on the account and share[d] with them the information we received. We also reached out to the customer to educate them about copyright infringement and offer assistance to help prevent the activity from continuing. A small number of customers who continue to receive additional copyright infringement notifications from content owners despite our efforts to educate them will have their service discontinued. When files are distributed on the Internet over peer-to-peer networks, the IP address associated with a subscriber's account is visible by design to other users on the network. Content owners provide these IP addresses to AT&T along with additional information about the content that was allegedly shared by that IP address.}}</ref>
Under AT&T’s current copyright enforcement program, content owners may notify AT&T when they allege unlawful sharing of material. The program is based on IP addresses visible to content owners in peer-to-peer networks, not on filtering. AT&T has terminated the broadband service of some customers accused of copyright infringement.


=== Discrimination against local public-access television channels ===
=== Discrimination against local public-access television channels ===
In 2009 AT&T was accused by community media groups of discriminating against local public, educational, and government access (PEG) cable TV channels, by "impictions that will severely restrict the audience".<ref name="dn10">(March 9, 2009) [http://www.democracynow.org/2009/3/9/at_t_accused_of_discriminating_against "AT&T Accused of Discriminating Against Local Public Access Channels, Deadline for Public Comment Expires Tonight"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090312075258/http://www.democracynow.org/2009/3/9/at_t_accused_of_discriminating_against |date=March 12, 2009}}, Democracy Now!. Retrieved March 13, 2009.</ref>
In 2009 AT&T was accused by community media groups of discriminating against local public, educational, and government access (PEG) cable TV channels, by "impictions that will severely restrict the audience".


According to Barbara Popovic, executive director of the Chicago public-access service Chicago Access Network Television|CAN-TV, the new AT&T U-verse system forced all Public-access television into a special menu system, denying normal functionality such as channel numbers, access to the standard program guide, and DVR recording.<ref name="dn10" /> The Ratepayer Advocates division of the California Public Utilities Commission reported: "Instead of putting the stations on individual channels, AT&T has bundled community stations into a generic channel that can only be navigated through a complex and lengthy process."<ref name="dn10" />
According to Barbara Popovic, executive director of the Chicago public-access service Chicago Access Network Television|CAN-TV, the new AT&T U-verse system forced all Public-access television into a special menu system, denying normal functionality such as channel numbers, access to the standard program guide, and DVR recording. The Ratepayer Advocates division of the California Public Utilities Commission reported: "Instead of putting the stations on individual channels, AT&T has bundled community stations into a generic channel that can only be navigated through a complex and lengthy process.


Sue Buske (president of telecommunications consulting firm the Buske Group and a former head of the National Federation of Local Cable Programmers/Alliance for Community Media) argue that this is "an overall attack [...] on public access across the [United States], the place in the dial around cities and communities where people can make their own media in their own communities".<ref name="dn10" />
Sue Buske (president of telecommunications consulting firm the Buske Group and a former head of the National Federation of Local Cable Programmers/Alliance for Community Media) argue that this is "an overall attack [...] on public access across the [United States], the place in the dial around cities and communities where people can make their own media in their own communities".


=== Information security ===
=== Information security ===
In June 2010, a hacker group known as Goatse Security discovered a Vulnerability (computing)|vulnerability within AT&T that could allow anyone to uncover email addresses belonging to customers of AT&T 3G service for the Apple Inc.|Apple iPad.<ref name="computerworld1">{{Cite news |last=Keizer |first=Gregg |date=June 10, 2010 |title='Brute force' script snatched iPad e-mail addresses |work=Computerworld |url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9177921/Brute_force_script_snatched_iPad_e_mail_addresses |access-date=September 18, 2010}}</ref> These email addresses could be accessed without a protective password.<ref name="computerworld2-2">{{Cite news |last=Keizer |first=Gregg |date=June 11, 2010 |title=iPad e-mail hackers defend attack as 'ethical' |page=2 |work=Computerworld |url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9177991/iPad_e_mail_hackers_defend_attack_as_ethical_?taxonomyId=17&pageNumber=2 |url-status=live |access-date=September 25, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302073447/http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9177991/iPad_e_mail_hackers_defend_attack_as_ethical_?taxonomyId=17&pageNumber=2 |archive-date=March 2, 2012}}</ref> Using a script, Goatse Security collected thousands of email addresses from AT&T.<ref name="computerworld1" /> Goatse Security informed AT&T about the security flaw through a third party.<ref name="computerworld2-1">{{Cite news |last=Keizer |first=Gregg |date=June 11, 2010 |title=iPad e-mail hackers defend attack as 'ethical' |page=1 |work=Computerworld |url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9177991/iPad_e_mail_hackers_defend_attack_as_ethical_ |url-status=live |access-date=September 25, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119211317/http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9177991/iPad_e_mail_hackers_defend_attack_as_ethical_ |archive-date=January 19, 2012}}</ref> Goatse Security then disclosed around 114,000 of these emails to Gawker Media, which published an article about the security flaw and disclosure in ''Valleywag''.<ref name="computerworld1" /><ref name="computerworld2-1" /> Praetorian Security Group criticized the web application that Goatse Security exploited as "poorly designed".<ref name="computerworld1" />
In June 2010, a hacker group known as Goatse Security discovered a Vulnerability (computing)|vulnerability within AT&T that could allow anyone to uncover email addresses belonging to customers of AT&T 3G service for the Apple Inc.|Apple iPad. These email addresses could be accessed without a protective password. Using a script, Goatse Security collected thousands of email addresses from AT&T. Goatse Security then disclosed around 114,000 of these emails to Gawker Media, which published an article about the security flaw and disclosure in ''Valleywag''. Praetorian Security Group criticized the web application that Goatse Security exploited as "poorly designed"


In April 2015, AT&T was fined $25 million over data security breaches, marking the largest ever fine issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for breaking data privacy laws. The investigation revealed the theft of details of approximately 280,000 people from call centres in Mexico, Colombia and the Philippines.<ref>{{Cite news |date=April 9, 2015 |title=AT&T pays record $25m fine over customer data thefts |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-32232604 |url-status=live |access-date=July 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181108110433/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-32232604 |archive-date=November 8, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=April 8, 2015 |title=F.C.C. Fines AT&T $25 Million for Privacy Breach |url=https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/08/f-c-c-fines-att-25-million-for-privacy-breach/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181113023431/https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/08/f-c-c-fines-att-25-million-for-privacy-breach/ |archive-date=November 13, 2018 |access-date=November 2, 2018 |website=New York Times}}</ref>
In April 2015, AT&T was fined $25 million over data security breaches, marking the largest ever fine issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for breaking data privacy laws. The investigation revealed the theft of details of approximately 280,000 people from call centres in Mexico, Colombia and the Philippines.


=== Accusations of enabling fraud ===
=== Accusations of enabling fraud ===
In March 2012, the United States federal government announced a lawsuit against AT&T. The specific accusations state that AT&T "violated the False Claims Act by facilitating and seeking federal payment for IP Relay calls by international callers who were ineligible for the service and sought to use it for fraudulent purposes. The complaint alleges that, out of fears that fraudulent call volume would drop after the registration deadline, AT&T knowingly adopted a non-compliant registration system that did not verify whether the user was located within the United States. The complaint further contends that AT&T continued to employ this system even with the knowledge that it facilitated the use of IP Relay by fraudulent foreign callers, which accounted for up to 95 percent of AT&T's call volume. The government's complaint alleges that AT&T improperly billed the TRS Fund for reimbursement of these calls and received millions of dollars in federal payments as a result."<ref>{{Cite web |date=March 22, 2012 |title=Welcome to the United States Department of Justice |url=https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/March/12-civ-357.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120519015822/http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/March/12-civ-357.html |archive-date=May 19, 2012 |access-date=May 11, 2012 |publisher=Justice.gov}}</ref> In 2013, AT&T entered into a consent decree with the FCC and paid a total of $21.75 million.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/att-agrees-settle-allegations-involving-ip-relay-services-provided-hearing-and-speech |title= AT&T Agrees to Settle Allegations Involving IP Relay Services Provided to Hearing- and Speech-Impaired Persons |date= November 7, 2013 |publisher= United States Department of Justice |access-date= March 23, 2021 |quote= On May 7, 2013, AT&T entered into a consent decree with the FCC that resolved allegations based on conduct related to the subject matter of today’s settlement. Pursuant to that consent decree, AT&T paid a total of $18.25 million. Under the settlement announced today, AT&T has agreed to pay an additional $3.5 million to resolve its remaining liability under the False Claims Act.}}</ref>
In March 2012, the United States federal government announced a lawsuit against AT&T. The specific accusations state that AT&T "violated the False Claims Act by facilitating and seeking federal payment for IP Relay calls by international callers who were ineligible for the service and sought to use it for fraudulent purposes. The complaint alleges that, out of fears that fraudulent call volume would drop after the registration deadline, AT&T knowingly adopted a non-compliant registration system that did not verify whether the user was located within the United States. The complaint further contends that AT&T continued to employ this system even with the knowledge that it facilitated the use of IP Relay by fraudulent foreign callers, which accounted for up to 95 percent of AT&T's call volume. The government's complaint alleges that AT&T improperly billed the TRS Fund for reimbursement of these calls and received millions of dollars in federal payments as a result." In 2013, AT&T entered into a consent decree with the FCC and paid a total of $21.75 million.


=== Racism ===
=== Racism ===
On April 28, 2015, AT&T announced that it had fired Aaron Slator, President of Content and Advertising Sales, for sending racist text messages.<ref>{{Cite news |title=AT&T Fires President Over Racist Text; $100M Lawsuit Goes On |work=ABC News |agency=Associated Press |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/att-fires-president-racist-text-100m-lawsuit-30658834 |url-status=dead |access-date=April 29, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429063307/https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/att-fires-president-racist-text-100m-lawsuit-30658834 |archive-date=April 29, 2015}}</ref> Slator was also hit with a $100 million discrimination lawsuit, filed by African-American employee Knoyme King.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Aaron Slator, AT&T president, fired over racist text messages |work=The Washington Times |url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/28/aaron-slator-t-president-fired-over-racist-text-me/ |url-status=live |access-date=April 29, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150501202930/http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/28/aaron-slator-t-president-fired-over-racist-text-me/ |archive-date=May 1, 2015}}</ref> The day before that, protesters arrived at AT&T's headquarters in Dallas and its satellite offices in Los Angeles as well as at the home of CEO Randall Stephenson to protest alleged systemic racial policies. According to accounts, the protesters demanded that AT&T begin working with 100% black-owned media companies.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Protesters Picket AT&T CEO's Dallas Estate |work=CNN iReport |url=http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1237563 |url-status=live |access-date=May 1, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150502002645/http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1237563 |archive-date=May 2, 2015}}</ref>
On April 28, 2015, AT&T announced that it had fired Aaron Slator, President of Content and Advertising Sales, for sending racist text messages. Slator was also hit with a $100 million discrimination lawsuit, filed by African-American employee Knoyme King. The day before that, protesters arrived at AT&T's headquarters in Dallas and its satellite offices in Los Angeles as well as at the home of CEO Randall Stephenson to protest alleged systemic racial policies. According to accounts, the protesters demanded that AT&T begin working with 100% black-owned media companies.


On January 24, 2017, Slator sued AT&T in the Los Angeles County Superior Court|Los Angeles Superior Court, accusing the company of defamation and wrongful termination. Slator had been involved in organizing AT&T's planned $48.5 billion acquisition of DirecTV since 2014, and he claimed that when news headlines speculated that his text messages could prevent the acquisition from going through, he was fired as a "scapegoat" by company executives. He also claimed that the executives had known about the text messages since at least late 2013, and had promised him at the time that he would not be fired for them.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Garrett |first=Arnessa |date=January 25, 2017 |title=AT&T sued by exec who was fired over racist text |work=The Dallas Morning News |url=https://www.dallasnews.com/business/local-companies/2017/01/25/att-sued-by-exec-who-was-fired-over-racist-text/ |access-date=May 20, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Robb |first=David |date=January 24, 2017 |title=Former AT&T Content President Files Wrongful Termination Suit, Claims He Was Fired To Save DirecTV Merger |work=Deadline |url=https://deadline.com/2017/01/lawsuit-attt-directv-aaron-slator-sues-for-wrongful-termination-1201892998/ |access-date=May 20, 2020}}</ref> The company stood by its decision to terminate Slator.<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.dallasnews.com/business/local-companies/2017/01/25/att-sued-by-exec-who-was-fired-over-racist-text/ |title= AT&T sued by exec who was fired over racist text |publisher= The Dallas Morning News |date= January 24, 2017 |access-date= March 23, 2021 |quote= "Diversity and inclusion are important core values to us," the statement said. "We stand behind our decision to terminate Mr. Slator and are confident that his baseless allegations will ultimately be rejected."}}</ref>
On January 24, 2017, Slator sued AT&T in the Los Angeles County Superior Court|Los Angeles Superior Court, accusing the company of defamation and wrongful termination. Slator had been involved in organizing AT&T's planned $48.5 billion acquisition of DirecTV since 2014, and he claimed that when news headlines speculated that his text messages could prevent the acquisition from going through, he was fired as a "scapegoat" by company executives. He also claimed that the executives had known about the text messages since at least late 2013, and had promised him at the time that he would not be fired for them. The company stood by its decision to terminate Slator.


=== Overcharging government agencies ===
=== Overcharging government agencies ===


In 2020 AT&T paid out $48 million to settle a lawsuit with 30 government entities. The suit (under the California False Claims Act) related to contractual undertakings to provide services at "the lowest cost available". AT&T denied any wrongdoing in the matter.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Osborne |first=Charlie |title=Verizon, AT&T settle overcharging whistleblower case for $116 million |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/verizon-at-t-settle-overcharging-whistleblower-case-for-116-million/ |access-date=September 25, 2020 |website=ZDNet |language=en}}</ref>
In 2020 AT&T paid out $48 million to settle a lawsuit with 30 government entities. The suit (under the California False Claims Act) related to contractual undertakings to provide services at "the lowest cost available". AT&T denied any wrongdoing in the matter.


== Naming rights and sponsorships ==
== Naming rights and sponsorships ==
Line 348: Line 310:
* Major League Soccer and the United States Soccer Federation, including the United States men's national soccer team|U.S. men's and United States women's national soccer team|U.S. women's national teams and the Major League Soccer All-Star Game from 2009 MLS All-Star Game|2009
* Major League Soccer and the United States Soccer Federation, including the United States men's national soccer team|U.S. men's and United States women's national soccer team|U.S. women's national teams and the Major League Soccer All-Star Game from 2009 MLS All-Star Game|2009
* Mexico national football team
* Mexico national football team
* United States Olympic team<ref>{{Cite web |title=Teamusa.org |url=http://www.teamusa.org/pages/sponsors |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111205122946/http://www.teamusa.org/pages/sponsors |archive-date=December 5, 2011 |access-date=November 28, 2011 |website=Teamusa.org}}</ref>
* United States Olympic team
* National Collegiate Athletic Association (Corporate Champion)<ref>{{Cite web |date=December 14, 2007 |title=NCAA.org |url=http://ncaa.org/wps/portal/ncaahome?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/corp_relations/CorpRel/Corporate+Relationships/Corporate+Alliances/partners.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110929220805/http://ncaa.org/wps/portal/ncaahome?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=%2Fcorp_relations%2FCorpRel%2FCorporate+Relationships%2FCorporate+Alliances%2Fpartners.html |archive-date=September 29, 2011 |access-date=November 28, 2011 |website=NCAA.org}}</ref>
* American Cup (gymnastics)|AT&T American Cup, artistic gymnastics competition, sponsored by AT&T since 2011
* American Cup (gymnastics)|AT&T American Cup, artistic gymnastics competition, sponsored by AT&T since 2011
* Red Bull Racing (Formula 1 racing team), technical support and sponsorship, 2011 to 2020<ref>{{Cite web |title=AT&T and Infiniti Red Bull Racing – Speeding up Team Communications |url=http://about.att.com/newsroom/att_and_infiniti_red_bull_racing.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161010184553/http://about.att.com/newsroom/att_and_infiniti_red_bull_racing.html |archive-date=October 10, 2016 |access-date=May 27, 2016 |publisher=AT&T |department=AT&T Newsroom}}</ref>
* Red Bull Racing (Formula 1 racing team), technical support and sponsorship, 2011 to 2020
* Cloud9, sponsorship since March 2019.<ref>{{Cite news |date=March 5, 2019 |title=AT&T Taking Esports Strategy to New Heights with Cloud9 Agreement |work=AT&T |url=https://about.att.com/story/2019/cloud9.html |url-status=live |access-date=March 26, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190326223409/https://about.att.com/story/2019/cloud9.html |archive-date=March 26, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Fitch |first=Adam |date=March 5, 2019 |title=Cloud9 enters sponsorship deal with AT&T |work=Esports Insider |url=https://esportsinsider.com/2019/03/cloud9-att-sponsorship/ |url-status=live |access-date=March 26, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190326223411/https://esportsinsider.com/2019/03/cloud9-att-sponsorship/ |archive-date=March 26, 2019}}</ref>
* Cloud9, sponsorship since March 2019.
* Club América, sponsorship since July 19, 2018
* Club América, sponsorship since July 19, 2018

Latest revision as of 19:46, 6 June 2021

3DO

Not much is known about AT&T's relationship with 3DO and why they never ended up releasing a console, however, they did display a prototype at the January 1994 Consumer Electronic Show.

Early 95 AT&T confirmed they were exiting the games business, they filed to dispose of their 3DO stake in May 95.

Company Overview

AT&T Inc. is an American multinational corporation|multinational conglomerate (company)|conglomerate holding company, Delaware General Corporation Law|Delaware-registered but it is headquartered at Whitacre Tower in Downtown Dallas, Texas. It is the world’s largest telecommunications company, and the second largest provider of mobile telephone services. as of2020, AT&T was ranked 9th on the Fortune 500 rankings of the largest United States corporations, with revenues of $181 billion.

During most of the 20th century, AT&T had a monopoly on phone service in the United States. The company began its history as the American District Telegraph Company, formed in St. Louis in 1878. After expanding services to Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, through a series of mergers, it became Southwestern Bell Telephone Company in 1920, which was then a subsidiary of American Telephone and Telegraph Company. The latter was a successor of the original Bell Telephone Company founded by Alexander Graham Bell in 1877. The American Bell Telephone Company formed the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) subsidiary in 1885. In 1899, AT&T became the parent company after the American Bell Telephone Company sold its assets to its subsidiary. The company was rebranded as AT&T Corporation|AT&T Corp. in 1994. The 1982 United States v. AT&T antitrust lawsuit resulted in the Breakup of the Bell System|divestiture of AT&T's ("Ma Bell") local operating subsidiaries which were grouped into seven Regional Bell Operating Company|Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs), commonly referred to as "Baby Bells", resulting in seven independent companies, The latter changed its name to SBC Communications Inc. in 1995. In 2005, SBC purchased its former parent AT&T Corp. and took on its branding, with the merged entity naming itself AT&T Inc. and using its history, a version of its iconic logo and stock-trading symbol. AT&T Inc. acquired BellSouth|BellSouth Corporation in 2006, the last independent Baby Bell company, making its formerly joint venture Cingular|Cingular Wireless (which had acquired AT&T Wireless in 2004) wholly owned and rebranding it as AT&T Mobility.

The current AT&T Breakup of the Bell System#Evolution of the Baby Bells|reconstitutes much of the former Bell System, and includes four of the seven “Baby Bells” along with the original AT&T Corp., including the AT&T Communications|long-distance division.

History

Origin and growth (1885–1981)

AT&T was founded as Bell Telephone Company by Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas A. Watson|Thomas Watson, Gardiner Greene Hubbard, and Thomas Sanders after Bell's patenting of the telephone in 1875. By 1881, Bell Telephone Company had become the American Bell Telephone Company. One of its subsidiaries was the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T), established in 1885. On December 30, 1899, AT&T acquired the assets of its parent American Bell Telephone, becoming the new parent company. AT&T established a network of local telephone subsidiaries in the United States. AT&T and its subsidiaries held a phone service monopoly, authorized in 1913 by government authorities with the Kingsbury Commitment, throughout most of the twentieth century. This monopoly was known as the Bell System, and during this period, AT&T was also known by the nickname Ma Bell.

Breakup and reformation (1982–2004)

In 1982, U.S. Breakup_of_the_Bell_System|regulators broke up the AT&T monopoly, requiring AT&T to divest its local subsidiaries, which it did by grouping them into seven individual companies. These new companies were known as Regional Bell Operating Companies, or more informally, Baby Bells. AT&T continued to operate long-distance services but faced increasing competition from overseas supplied competitors such as MCI Communications|MCI and Sprint Corporation|Sprint.

Southwestern Bell Corporation (SBC) was one of the companies created by the breakup of AT&T Corp. The company soon started a series of acquisitions, including the 1987 acquisition of Metromedia mobile business and the acquisition of several cable companies in the early 1990s.Template:Citation needed In the latter half of the 1990s, the company acquired several other telecommunications companies, including two Baby Bells (Pacific_Telesis|Pacific Telesis Group and Ameritech|Ameritech Corporation), while selling its cable business. During this time, the company changed its name to SBC Communications Inc. By 1998, the company was in the top 15 of the Fortune 500, and by 1999 the company was part of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (lasting through 2015).

Purchase of former parent and acquisitions (2005–2014)

On November 18, 2005, SBC Communications, Inc.based in San Antonio, purchased AT&T Corp. for $16 billion. After this purchase, SBC adopted the better-known AT&T name and brand, with the original AT&T Corp. still existing as the long-distance landline subsidiary of the merged company. but retains SBC’s 1983-2005 corporate structure and pre-2005 stock price history.

AT&T made History of AT&T#2011: Attempted acquisition of T-Mobile USA|an attempt in 2011 to purchase T-Mobile for a $39 billion stock and cash offer. The bid was withdrawn after the takeover company was faced with significant regulatory and legal hurdles, along with heavy resistance from the U.S. government. As per the original acquisition agreement, T-Mobile received $3 billion in cash as well as access to $1 billion worth of AT&T-held wireless spectrum.

In September 2013, AT&T announced it would expand into Latin America through a collaboration with América Móvil. In December 2013, AT&T announced plans to sell its Connecticut wireline operations to Stamford-based Frontier Communications.

AT&T acquired BellSouth|BellSouth Corporation on December 29, 2006 following Federal_Communications_Commission|FCC approval. The transaction consolidated ownership and management of Cingular Wireless. AT&T rebranded its wireless retail stores from Cingular to AT&T in January 2007.

Recent developments (2014–present)

In late 2014, AT&T purchased Mexican cellular carrier Iusacell, and two months later, it purchased the Mexican wireless business of NII Holdings. AT&T merged the two companies to create AT&T Mexico.

In July 2015, AT&T purchased DirecTV for $48.5 billion. AT&T then announced plans to converge its existing U-verse home internet and IPTV brands with DirecTV, to create AT&T Entertainment.

On October 22, 2016, AT&T announced a deal to buy Time Warner for $108.7 billion in an effort to increase its media holdings.

AT&T also owns approximately a 2% stake in Canada|Canadian-domiciled entertainment company Lionsgate.

On July 13, 2017, it was reported that AT&T would introduce a cloud computing|cloud-based Digital video recorder|DVR streaming service as part of its effort to create a unified platform across DirecTV and its DirecTV Now streaming service, with AT&T U-verse|U-verse to be added soon.< In October 2018, it was announced that the service would launch in 2019. Named HBO Max, the service's release date was pushed to May 2020.

On September 12, 2017, it was reported that AT&T planned to launch a new cable TV-like service for delivery over-the-top over its own or a competitor's broadband network sometime next year.

On November 20, 2017, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim filed a lawsuit for the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division to block the merger with Time Warner, saying it "will harm competition, result in higher bills for consumers and less innovation." In order for AT&T to fully acquire Time Warner, the Department of Justice stated that the company must divest either DirecTV or Turner Broadcasting System.

As of 2017, AT&T is the world's largest telecommunications company. AT&T is also the largest provider of mobile telephone  services and the largest provider of telephone|fixed telephone services in the United States.

On March 7, 2018, the company prepared to sell a minority stake of DirecTV Latin America through an Initial public offering|IPO, creating a new holding company for those assets named Vrio Corp. However, on April 18, just a day before the public debut of Vrio, AT&T canceled the IPO due to market conditions.

On June 12, 2018, AT&T was given permission by U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Leon to go ahead with its $85 billion deal for Time Warner. The DOJ had attempted to stop the merger, fearing it would harm competition. The merger closed two days after, becoming a wholly owned subsidiary and division of AT&T with a new name, WarnerMedia, announced the next day. The acquisition of WarnerMedia by AT&T took place on June 15, 2018. Among other key assets, the acquisition of WarnerMedia by AT&T included the Warner Bros. Pictures film and television studios, U.S. cable/satellite channels such as, HBO, WarnerMedia Studios & Networks Group (Adult Swim, Boomerang (TV network)|Boomerang, Cartoon Network, CNN, TBS (American TV channel)|TBS, TNT (American TV network)|TNT, TruTV, and Turner Classic Movies), and 50% stake in The CW (partnered 50% state in ViacomCBS).

Three months after completing the acquisition, AT&T reorganized into four main units: Communications, including consumer and business wireline telephony, AT&T Mobility, and consumer entertainment video services; WarnerMedia, including Turner cable television networks, Warner Bros. film and television production, and HBO; AT&T Latin America, consisting of wireless service in Mexico and video in Latin America and the Caribbean under the Vrio (company)|Vrio brand; and Advertising and Analytics, since renamed Xandr.

By 2019, AT&T had developed partnerships with health care providers to develop Internet of things#Medical and healthcare|mobile health-related connectivity devices that aid inpatient care. Key products include a telemetry device that monitors patient metrics, while toggling between WIFI and cellular connectivity.

In September 2019, activist investor Elliott Management Corporation|Elliott Management revealed that it had purchased $3.2 billion of AT&T stock (a 1.2% equity interest), and had pushed for the company to divest assets to improve its share value.

On March 4, 2020, AT&T announced its intent to perform major cost-cutting moves, including cuts to capital investment, and plans to promote AT&T TV (which officially launched nationally on March 2) as its primary pay television service offering. AT&T will still primarily promote DirecTV "where cable broadband is not prevalent", and as a specialty option.

On April 24, 2020, AT&T announced that effective July 1, 2020, company COO John Stankey would replace Randall L. Stephenson as CEO of AT&T. It was also acknowledged that AT&T's acquisitions of DirecTV and Time Warner had by this point resulted in a massive debt burden of $200 billion for the company.

As a result of planned cost cutting programs, the sale of Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment, Xandr, DirecTV including AT&T U-Verse and AT&T TV Template:Small, Crunchyroll Template:Small, and Rooster Teeth were proposed. The planned sale of Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment was abandoned after COVID-19 related growth in the Gaming industry, as well as a positive reception to upcoming DC Comics, Lego Star Wars, and Harry Potter titles from fans and critics. The other subsidiaries are still receiving bids as of September 1, 2020.

On December 25, 2020, 2020 Nashville bombing|a bombing in Nashville, Tennessee, caused AT&T service outages across the U.S., but primarily in Middle Tennessee. Cellular, wireline telephone, Internet, and AT&T U-verse|U-verse television services were affected due to infrastructure damage to an AT&T service facility located near the blast site.

In January 2021, AT&T announced that, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, around 300 jobs might get affected as it was planning to cut its workforce in Slovakia.

In May 2021, AT&T announced it will spin off WarnerMedia which will merge with Discovery, Inc. for $43 billion.

AT&T Latin America

AT&T Latin America (formerly AT&T International, Inc.) is a wholly owned division of AT&T which operates in Mexico and 11 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.

In 2017, AT&T announced a new AT&T International corporate division housing AT&T Mexico, DirecTV Latin America and their stakes of SKY Brazil and Sky Mexico.

In October 2016, AT&T announced a deal to acquire Time Warner worth $85.4 billion (including assumed Time Warner debt). The proposed deal would give AT&T significant holdings in the media industry; AT&T's competitor Comcast had previously acquired NBCUniversal in a similar bid to increase its media holdings, in concert with its ownership of television and internet providers. If approved by federal regulators, the merger would bring Time Warner's properties under the same umbrella as AT&T's telecommunication holdings, including satellite provider DirecTV.

By the end of July, the company announced that, effective August 1, a new structure was created before the acquisition would close. On September 15, 2017, Reuters reported, citing anonymous sources, that AT&T, the owner of DIRECTV's U.S. and Latin American divisions, had hired an advisor to consider offering AT&T Latin America on the public stock market. In November 2017, the United States Department of Justice|U.S. Justice Department said it was moving to sue to block the AT&T-Time Warner merger. On November 20, 2017, the Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit over the acquisition; Makan Delrahim stated that the deal would "greatly harm American consumers". AT&T asserts that this suit is a "radical and inexplicable departure from decades of antitrust precedent". On December 22, 2017, the merger agreement deadline was extended to June 21, 2018. On April 19, 2018, the IPO was cancelled. On June 12, 2018, the AT&T-Time Warner merger was approved by a federal judge. Two days later, AT&T completed the acquisition of Time Warner, and a day later, the company was renamed WarnerMedia.

On September 21, 2018, AT&T reclassified its four principal divisions which include AT&T International which now have some assets moved out like the RSNs, and also merging Consumer Mobility, Technology, and Business Mobility and renamed the company as AT&T Latin America.

In October 2019, AT&T Latin America announced its intention to sell their Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands operations to Liberty Latin America, as a result of shareholder pressure from Elliott Management.

Landline operating companies

Of the eight companies that were part of the Breakup of the Bell System, these five are a part of the current AT&T:

  • Ameritech, acquired by SBC in 1999
  • AT&T Corp., acquired by SBC in 2005
  • BellSouth, acquired by AT&T in 2006
  • Pacific Telesis, acquired by SBC in 1997
  • Southwestern Bell, rebranded as SBC Communications in 1995

Former operating companies

The following companies have become defunct or were sold under SBC/AT&T ownership:

  • Southern New England Telephone: sold to Frontier Communications in 2014
    • Woodbury Telephone: merged into Southern New England Telephone on June 1, 2007.

Decline of rural landlines

Of the Baby Bells, Ameritech sold some of its Wisconsin landlines to CenturyTel, in 1998; BellSouth sold some of its lines to MebTel, during the 2000s; US West|U S WEST sold many historically Bell landlines to Lynch Communications and Pacific Telecom, in the 1990s; Verizon sold many of its Verizon New England|New England lines to FairPoint Communications|FairPoint, in 2008, and its Frontier West Virginia|West Virginia operations to Frontier Communications, in 2010.

On October 25, 2014, Frontier Communications took over control of the AT&T landline network in Connecticut after being approved by state utility regulators. The deal was worth about $2 billion, and included Frontier inheriting about 2,500 of AT&T's employees and many of AT&T's buildings.


Facilities and regions

The company is headquartered at Whitacre Tower in downtown Dallas, Texas. The company said that it moved to gain better access to its customers and operations throughout the world, and to the key technology partners, suppliers, innovation and human resources needed as it continues to grow, domestically and internationally. AT&T Inc. previously relocated its corporate headquarters to San Antonio from St. Louis, Missouri, in 1992, when it was then named Southwestern Bell Corporation. The company's Telecom Operations group, which serves residential and regional business customers in 22 U.S. states, remains in San Antonio. Atlanta, Georgia, continues to be the headquarters for AT&T Mobility, with significant offices in Redmond, Washington, the former home of AT&T Wireless Services|AT&T Wireless. Bedminster, New Jersey, is the headquarters for the company's Global Business Services group and AT&T Labs and is where the original AT&T Corp. remains located. St. Louis continues as home to the company's Directory operations, AT&T Advertising Solutions. As announced by its predecessor Time Warner in 2013, WarnerMedia, an AT&T subsidiary acquired in 2016, is headquartered in the 30 Hudson Yards tower, located in New York City.

AT&T also offers services in many locations throughout the Asia-Pacific|Asia Pacific; its regional headquarters is located in Hong Kong. The company is also active in Mexico, and on November 7, 2014, it was announced that Mexican carrier Iusacell would be acquired by AT&T. On April 30, 2015, AT&T acquired wireless operations Nextel Mexico from NII Holdings (now AT&T Mexico).

Corporate governance

AT&T's current board of directors as of 2021 May

  • William E. Kennard – Chairperson|chairman
  • Samuel A. DiPiazza, Jr.
  • Scott T. Ford
  • Glenn H. Hutchins
  • Debra L. Lee
  • Stephen J. Luczo
  • Michael B. McCallister
  • Beth E. Mooney
  • Matthew K. Rose
  • John Stankey
  • Cynthia B. Taylor
  • Geoffrey Y. Yang


The current management as of 2021 April includes:

  • John Stankey – Chief Executive Officer|CEO
  • Ed Gillespie – senior executive vice president of external and legislative affairs
  • David S. Huntley – senior executive vice president and chief compliance officer
  • Jason Kilar – chief executive officer of WarnerMedia
  • Lori Lee – chief executive officer of AT&T Latin America and global marketing officer
  • Jeff McElfresh - chief executive officer of AT&T Communications
  • David R. McAtee II – senior executive vice president and general counsel
  • Angela Santone – senior executive vice president of human resources
  • Pascal Desroches - Chief financial officer|CFO

Political involvement

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, AT&T was the fourteenth-largest donor to United States federal political campaigns and committees from 1989 to 2019, having contributed more than US$84.1 million, 58% of which went to Republican Party (United States)|Republicans and 42% of which went to Democratic Party (United States)|Democrats. As an example, in 2005, AT&T was among 53 entities that contributed the maximum of $250,000 to the second inauguration of President George W. Bush. Bill Leahy, representing AT&T, sits on the Private Enterprise Board of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). ALEC is a nonprofit organization of conservatism in the United States|conservative state legislature (United States)|state legislators and private sector representatives that drafts and shares model state-level legislation for distribution among state governments in the United States.

During the period of 1998 to 2019, the company expended Template:US$ on lobbying in the United States. A key political issue for AT&T has been the question of which businesses win the right to profit by providing broadband internet access in the United States. The company has also lobbied in support of several federal bills. AT&T supported the Federal Communications Commission Process Reform Act of 2013 (H.R. 3675; 113th Congress), a bill that would make a number of changes to procedures that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) follows in its rulemaking processes. The FCC would have to act in a more transparent way as a result of this bill, forced to accept public input about regulations. AT&T's Executive Vice President of Federal Relations, Tim McKone, said that the bill's "much needed institutional reforms will help arm the agency with the tools to keep pace with the Internet speed of today's marketplace. It will also ensure that outmoded regulatory practices for today's competitive marketplace are properly placed in the dustbin of history."

In May 2018, reports emerged that AT&T made 12 monthly payments between January and December 2017 to Essential Consultants, a company set up by President Donald Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen (lawyer)|Michael Cohen, totaling $600,000. Although initial reports on May 8 mentioned only four monthly payments totaling $200,000, documents obtained by the The Washington Post|Washington Post on May 10 confirmed the figure of 12 payments, which had begun three days after the President was Inauguration of Donald Trump|sworn into office. AT&T confirmed the report the same day. The report from The Washington Post, as well as additional reporting from Bloomberg News|Bloomberg, revealed the payments had been made for Cohen to "provide guidance" relating to the attempted $85 billion merger with Time Warner, to gain information on the Trump administration's planned tax reforms, as well as about potential changes to Net neutrality in the United States|net neutrality policies under the new FCC. However, Chairman of the FCC Ajit Pai denied Cohen ever inquired about net neutrality on AT&T's behalf. A spokesperson for AT&T said that the company had been contacted by Special Counsel investigation (2017–present)|the Special Counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller regarding the payments, and had provided all the information requested in November and December 2017.

In early 2019, the Democratic United States House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary requested records related to the AT&T-Time Warner merger from the White House.

Historical financial performance

The financial performance of the company is reported to shareholders on an annual basis and a matter of public record. Where performance has been restated, the most recent statement of performance from an annual report is used.

Performance measurements, by year
Measurement 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Revenues (billion USD) 45.38 43.14 40.50 40.79 43.86 63.06 118.9 124.0 122.5 124.8 126.7 127.4 128.8 132.4 146.8 163.8 160.5 170.8 181.2
Net Income (billion USD) 7.008 5.653 8.505 5.887 4.786 7.356 11.95 12.87 12.14 19.86 3.944 7.264 18.25 6.224 13.69 13.33 29.85 19.37 13.90
Assets (billion USD) 96.42 95.17 102.0 110.3 145.6 270.6 275.6 265.2 268.3 268.5 270.3 272.3 277.8 292.8 402.7 403.8 444.1 531.9 551.7
Number of employees (thousands) 193.4 175.0 168.0 162.7 190.0 304.2 309.1 302.7 282.7 266.6 256.4 241.8 243.4 243.6 281.5 268.5 254.0 268.2 247.8

Criticism and controversies

Hemisphere database

The company maintains a database of call detail records of all telephone calls that have passed through its network since 1987. AT&T employees work at High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area offices (operated by the Office of National Drug Control Policy) in Los Angeles, Atlanta, and Houston so data can be quickly turned over to law enforcement agencies. Records are requested via an administrative subpoena, without the involvement of a court or grand jury.

Censorship

In September 2007, AT&T changed its legal policy to state that "AT&T may immediately terminate or suspend all or a portion of your Service, any Member ID, electronic mail address, IP address, Universal Resource Locator or domain name used by you, without notice for conduct that AT&T believes ... (c) tends to damage the name or reputation of AT&T, or its parents, affiliates and subsidiaries." By October 10, 2007, AT&T had altered the terms and conditions for its Internet service to explicitly support freedom of expression by its subscribers, after an outcry claiming the company had given itself the right to censor its subscribers' transmissions.

Privacy controversy

In 2006, the Electronic Frontier Foundation lodged the class action lawsuit Hepting v. AT&T, which alleged that AT&T had allowed agents of the National Security Agency (NSA) to monitor phone and Internet communications of AT&T customers without warrants. If true, this would violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First and Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendments of the United States Constitution|U.S. Constitution. AT&T has yet to confirm or deny that monitoring by the NSA is occurring. In April 2006, retired former AT&T technician Mark Klein lodged an affidavit supporting this allegation. The Department of Justice stated it would intervene in this lawsuit by means of State Secrets Privilege.

In July 2006, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California – in which the suit was filed – rejected a federal government motion to dismiss the case. The motion to dismiss, which invoked the State Secrets Privilege, had argued that any court review of the alleged partnership between the federal government and AT&T would harm national security. The case was immediately appealed to the Ninth Circuit. It was dismissed on June 3, 2009, citing retroactive legislation in the FISA Amendments Act|Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

In May 2006, USA Today reported that all international and domestic calling records had been handed over to the National Security Agency by AT&T, Verizon, SBC, and BellSouth for the purpose of creating a massive NSA call database|calling database. The portions of the new AT&T that had been part of SBC Communications before November 18, 2005, were not mentioned.

On June 21, 2006, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that AT&T had rewritten rules on its privacy policy. The policy, which took effect June 23, 2006, says that "AT&T – not customers – owns customers' confidential info and can use it 'to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process.'"

On August 22, 2007, National Intelligence Director John Michael McConnell|Mike McConnell confirmed that AT&T was one of the telecommunications companies that assisted with the government's warrantless wire-tapping program on calls between foreign and domestic sources.

On November 8, 2007, Mark Klein, a former AT&T technician, told Keith Olbermann of MSNBC that all Internet traffic passing over AT&T lines was copied into Room 641A|a locked room at the company's San Francisco office – to which only employees with National Security Agency clearance had access.

AT&T keeps for five to seven years a record of who text messages whom and the date and time, but not the content of the messages.

AT&T has a one star privacy rating from the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Copyright enforcement

In January 2008, reports emerged that the company planned to begin filtering all Internet traffic which passed through its network for intellectual property violations. Media commentators speculated that if this plan was implemented, it would have led to a mass exodus of subscribers from AT&T, although Internet traffic of non-subscribers may have gone through the company's network anyway. Internet freedom proponents used these developments as justification for government-mandated network neutrality.

Under AT&T’s current copyright enforcement program, content owners may notify AT&T when they allege unlawful sharing of material. The program is based on IP addresses visible to content owners in peer-to-peer networks, not on filtering. AT&T has terminated the broadband service of some customers accused of copyright infringement.

Discrimination against local public-access television channels

In 2009 AT&T was accused by community media groups of discriminating against local public, educational, and government access (PEG) cable TV channels, by "impictions that will severely restrict the audience".

According to Barbara Popovic, executive director of the Chicago public-access service Chicago Access Network Television|CAN-TV, the new AT&T U-verse system forced all Public-access television into a special menu system, denying normal functionality such as channel numbers, access to the standard program guide, and DVR recording. The Ratepayer Advocates division of the California Public Utilities Commission reported: "Instead of putting the stations on individual channels, AT&T has bundled community stations into a generic channel that can only be navigated through a complex and lengthy process.

Sue Buske (president of telecommunications consulting firm the Buske Group and a former head of the National Federation of Local Cable Programmers/Alliance for Community Media) argue that this is "an overall attack [...] on public access across the [United States], the place in the dial around cities and communities where people can make their own media in their own communities".

Information security

In June 2010, a hacker group known as Goatse Security discovered a Vulnerability (computing)|vulnerability within AT&T that could allow anyone to uncover email addresses belonging to customers of AT&T 3G service for the Apple Inc.|Apple iPad. These email addresses could be accessed without a protective password. Using a script, Goatse Security collected thousands of email addresses from AT&T. Goatse Security then disclosed around 114,000 of these emails to Gawker Media, which published an article about the security flaw and disclosure in Valleywag. Praetorian Security Group criticized the web application that Goatse Security exploited as "poorly designed"

In April 2015, AT&T was fined $25 million over data security breaches, marking the largest ever fine issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for breaking data privacy laws. The investigation revealed the theft of details of approximately 280,000 people from call centres in Mexico, Colombia and the Philippines.

Accusations of enabling fraud

In March 2012, the United States federal government announced a lawsuit against AT&T. The specific accusations state that AT&T "violated the False Claims Act by facilitating and seeking federal payment for IP Relay calls by international callers who were ineligible for the service and sought to use it for fraudulent purposes. The complaint alleges that, out of fears that fraudulent call volume would drop after the registration deadline, AT&T knowingly adopted a non-compliant registration system that did not verify whether the user was located within the United States. The complaint further contends that AT&T continued to employ this system even with the knowledge that it facilitated the use of IP Relay by fraudulent foreign callers, which accounted for up to 95 percent of AT&T's call volume. The government's complaint alleges that AT&T improperly billed the TRS Fund for reimbursement of these calls and received millions of dollars in federal payments as a result." In 2013, AT&T entered into a consent decree with the FCC and paid a total of $21.75 million.

Racism

On April 28, 2015, AT&T announced that it had fired Aaron Slator, President of Content and Advertising Sales, for sending racist text messages. Slator was also hit with a $100 million discrimination lawsuit, filed by African-American employee Knoyme King. The day before that, protesters arrived at AT&T's headquarters in Dallas and its satellite offices in Los Angeles as well as at the home of CEO Randall Stephenson to protest alleged systemic racial policies. According to accounts, the protesters demanded that AT&T begin working with 100% black-owned media companies.

On January 24, 2017, Slator sued AT&T in the Los Angeles County Superior Court|Los Angeles Superior Court, accusing the company of defamation and wrongful termination. Slator had been involved in organizing AT&T's planned $48.5 billion acquisition of DirecTV since 2014, and he claimed that when news headlines speculated that his text messages could prevent the acquisition from going through, he was fired as a "scapegoat" by company executives. He also claimed that the executives had known about the text messages since at least late 2013, and had promised him at the time that he would not be fired for them. The company stood by its decision to terminate Slator.

Overcharging government agencies

In 2020 AT&T paid out $48 million to settle a lawsuit with 30 government entities. The suit (under the California False Claims Act) related to contractual undertakings to provide services at "the lowest cost available". AT&T denied any wrongdoing in the matter.

Naming rights and sponsorships

Buildings

File:Att-midtown-center-atlanta.jpg|thumb|AT&T Midtown Center in Atlanta, Georgia

  • Whitacre Tower (One AT&T Plaza) – corporate headquarters, Dallas, Texas
  • AT&T 220 Building – building in Indianapolis, Indiana
  • AT&T Building (Detroit)|AT&T Building – building in Detroit, Michigan
  • AT&T Building (Indianapolis)|AT&T Building – building in Indianapolis, Indiana
  • AT&T Building (Kingman, Arizona)|AT&T Building – building in Kingman, Arizona
  • AT&T Building (Nashville)|AT&T Building – (aka "The Batman Building") in Nashville, Tennessee
  • AT&T Building (Omaha)|AT&T Building – building in Omaha, Nebraska
  • AT&T Building Addition (Detroit)|AT&T Building Addition – building in Detroit, Michigan
  • AT&T Building (San Diego)|AT&T Building – building in San Diego
  • AT&T Center (Los Angeles)|AT&T Center – building in Los Angeles
  • AT&T Center (St. Louis)|AT&T Center – building in St. Louis, Missouri
  • AT&T City Center – building in Birmingham, Alabama
  • AT&T Corporate Center – building in Chicago, Illinois
  • AT&T Huron Road Building – building in Cleveland, Ohio
  • AT&T Lenox Park (DeKalb County, Georgia)|Lenox Park Campus – AT&T Mobility Headquarters in DeKalb County just outside Atlanta, Georgia
  • AT&T Midtown Center – building in Atlanta, Georgia
  • AT&T Switching Center – building in Los Angeles
  • AT&T Switching Center – building in Oakland, California
  • AT&T Switching Center – building in San Francisco
  • AT&T Tower (Minneapolis)|AT&T Tower – building in Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • AT&T Building – building in Meriden, Connecticut
  • AT&T Entertainment Group HQ – DirecTV corporate campus in El Segundo, California

Venues

File:Texasdd.JPG|thumb|AT&T Center in San Antonio, Texas

  • AT&T Center – San Antonio, Texas (formerly SBC Center)
  • AT&T Field – Chattanooga, Tennessee (formerly BellSouth Park)
  • AT&T Plaza – Chicago, Illinois (public space that hosts the Cloud Gate sculpture in Millennium Park)
  • American Airlines Center|AT&T Plaza – Dallas, Texas (plaza in front of the American Airlines Center at Victory Park, Dallas, Texas|Victory Park)
  • AT&T Performing Arts Center – Dallas, Texas
  • AT&T Stadium – Arlington, Texas (formerly Dallas Cowboys Stadium)
  • AT&T Stadium – Glen Jean, West Virginia (outdoor open-seating stadium at the Boy Scouts of America's The Summit Bechtel Family National Scout Reserve|Summit Bechtel Reserve
  • Jones AT&T Stadium – Lubbock, Texas (formerly Clifford B. and Audrey Jones Stadium, Jones SBC Stadium)
  • TPC San Antonio – San Antonio, Texas (AT&T Oaks Course & AT&T Canyons Course)
  • War Memorial Stadium (Arkansas)|War Memorial Stadium, AT&T Field – Little Rock, Arkansas

Sponsorships

  • AT&T Byron Nelson – Irving, Texas (golf)
  • Cotton Bowl Classic|AT&T Cotton Bowl Classic (formerly Mobil Cotton Bowl Classic, Southwestern Bell Cotton Bowl Classic, SBC Cotton Bowl Classic) – played in Arlington, Texas, at AT&T Stadium (football)
  • AT&T National – Washington, D.C. (golf)
  • AT&T Pebble Beach National Pro-Am (golf)
  • AT&T Red River Rivalry – Dallas, Texas (formerly Red River Shootout, SBC Red River Rivalry) (football)
  • Major League Soccer and the United States Soccer Federation, including the United States men's national soccer team|U.S. men's and United States women's national soccer team|U.S. women's national teams and the Major League Soccer All-Star Game from 2009 MLS All-Star Game|2009
  • Mexico national football team
  • United States Olympic team
  • American Cup (gymnastics)|AT&T American Cup, artistic gymnastics competition, sponsored by AT&T since 2011
  • Red Bull Racing (Formula 1 racing team), technical support and sponsorship, 2011 to 2020
  • Cloud9, sponsorship since March 2019.
  • Club América, sponsorship since July 19, 2018